Velocity after a totally inelastic collision

AI Thread Summary
In a scenario involving a 1000-kg car traveling at 25 m/s and a 9.0-g bug moving at -1.5 m/s, the goal is to determine the change in the car's velocity after a totally inelastic collision with the bug. The conservation of momentum equation is applied, leading to the formulation of the final velocity equation. The correct approach involves calculating the final velocity using the provided momentum values and then determining the change in velocity by subtracting the initial velocity of the car. A suggestion is made to simplify the relationship to a common denominator for clarity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the momentum conservation principle to solve the problem.
Manh
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are driving your 1000-kg car at a velocity of(25 m/s )ι^ when a 9.0-g bug splatters on your windshield. Before the collision, the bug was traveling at a velocity of (-1.5 m/s )ι^.
What is the change in velocity of the car due to its encounter with the bug?

Homework Equations


pi = pf
m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1 + m2)v

The Attempt at a Solution


p1 + p2 = (m1 + m2)v
(2.5 x 10^4) + (-1.35 x 10^-2) = (1000 + 0.009)v
v = 25 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So is there a question here?
 
Chestermiller said:
So is there a question here?
Yes. The question is "What is the change in velocity of the car due to its encounter with the bug?". I also came up with an answer but it was incorrect.
 
Manh said:
Yes. The question is "What is the change in velocity of the car due to its encounter with the bug?". I also came up with an answer but it was incorrect.
You got the correct equation for the final velocity, and I am just going to re-write it out for you as follows:

$$v=\frac{(2.5 \times 10^4-1.35 \times 10^{-2})}{1000+0.009}$$

If you subtract the original velocity of the car, you get the change in velocity Δv:

$$Δv=\frac{(2.5 \times 10^4-1.35 \times 10^{-2})}{1000+0.009}-25$$

Now, what I would like you to do is to reduce the relationship to a common denominator, without first evaluating the first term and without combining terms in the numerator. What do you get?

Chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top