Velocity and height of a ball thrown at an angle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the initial speed and maximum height of a baseball thrown at a 35-degree angle, landing 390 feet away at the same height. Participants clarify that angles should be expressed in degrees, not degrees Celsius, and emphasize the importance of using the correct equations for projectile motion. The range equation is highlighted as essential for determining the initial speed, but a key mistake identified is the failure to convert the distance from feet to meters before applying the formula. The correct conversion and unit consistency are crucial for accurate calculations. Overall, proper unit management and the right equations are necessary for solving the problem effectively.
enantiomer1
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A batted baseball leaves the bat at an angle of 35.0 degrees celcius above the horizontal and is caught by an outfielder 390 ft from home plate at the same height from which it left the bat. what was the initial speed of the ball and How high does the ball rise above the point where it struck the bat?

Homework Equations


D= v0t
D= v0sin 35 degrees

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to figure it out using both the equations, but I guess I must be doing something wrong, does anyone know what equation I'm not using?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, angles do not have units in degrees celsius; angles can be in degrees or radians. You probably had a mind slip, right? =)

Second, the equations that you posted aren't useful right now, but they could be later depending on your problem-solving approach.

Let's work on the first listed unknown, the initial speed of the ball. What is the given data? We know the given angle (35 degrees), and we know that total horizontal distance the ball travels (390 feet--don't forget to convert to meters, if the answer requires it). The ball initially leaves the bat at some height that is unknown, but we do know that the ball is caught at exactly this same height. There is a specialized term to describe such a horizontal distance. What is this term? Do you have any equations for such motion that use this term?
 
The equation I was looking for is v0= sqrt(R[which in this case is just x]*g/sin(2 theta).
However everytime I plug it in I get sqrt(390*9.81/sin(70))= 63.81 ft/s, converted to m/s this is 63.81 ft/s * .3048 = 19.45 and this is STILL wrong... what am I not adding?
 
Yes, as you have demonstrated, you want to use the range equation here.

Your problem is that you did not covert 390 ft into meters first. Notice that you have 390 * 9.81; 390 is in units of feet and 9.81 is in units of "meters" per second-squared. Your mixing the length units.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top