Velocity and kinetic energy of a neutron

carus88
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Calculate the velocity and kinetic energy of a neutron (mass 1.675x10-27kg) that has a wavelength of 0.2nm. How does this compare to the average kinetic energy of a gas molecule at room temperature (0.038eV at 200C)?

1. E=mc^2

2. KE = 1/2 mv^2

I used 1. to calculate the energy which was 1.51 x10^-10 J

Then i subbed the energy into 2. and got a velocity of 4.24 x10^8 m/s

LOL obviously I'm going wrong some where how can a neutron be going faster than light!

CAN SOMEONE HELP PLEASE?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy you are computing is the rest energy, not the kinetic energy. To get the velocity use the de Broglie relation between wavelength and momentum. Then use that velocity to compute the kinetic energy.
 
sorry bout the multiple post i don't know how to delete the other one?

i used :

1. lambda=h/p=h/mv

an got v to = 1.98x10^3 m/s

then used ke = 0.5mv^2 = 0.0205eV

are these answers correct?

i attampted the the 2nd part and worked out a percentage
based on the respective energies an that the neutron had 46.1% less energy than the molecule
 
Looks right to me.
 
Thank you for your help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top