Velocity Factor & Wave Length: What's the Connection?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Velocity Factor (VF) and wavelength in electrical signals, particularly in coaxial cables. The Velocity Factor is defined as the speed of signal propagation as a fraction of the speed of light, and it influences the wavelength calculation. The formula for wavelength is given as wavelength = VF * (speed of light / frequency), and the dielectric constant (Er) of the material also plays a role in determining the VF. Participants express confusion about how to incorporate Er into calculations and its impact on VF, with suggestions to clarify the context of the question for better assistance. Overall, understanding the interaction between VF, wavelength, and dielectric properties is crucial in signal transmission analysis.
edieber
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
is the Velocity Factor is a factor to caculate the length wave(gama) or its only connected to the type of the cabe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you try rephrasing the question? Perhaps there are others on the board who speak your native language who will help you translate.
 
Integral said:
Could you try rephrasing the question? Perhaps there are others on the board who speak your native language who will help you translate.

I just want to know the meaning of Velocity Factor and if it influence the calculation of the length wave? :rolleyes:
 
edieber said:
I just want to know the meaning of Velocity Factor and if it influence the calculation of the length wave? :rolleyes:


Your going to have to be a lot clearer and give the context as what you are using is from what I gather the 'velocity factor' is engineering terminlogy referring to the speed of propagation of a signal as a fraction of c, though I could be wrong (and I think you mean wavelength not 'length wave').
 
jcsd said:
Your going to have to be a lot clearer and give the context as what you are using is from what I gather the 'velocity factor' is engineering terminlogy referring to the speed of propagation of a signal as a fraction of c, though I could be wrong (and I think you mean wavelength not 'length wave').

do you know if it influence the wavelength? :confused:
 
Yes, the relative speed of the source and the detector influences the observed wavelength.
 
Tide said:
Yes, the relative speed of the source and the detector influences the observed wavelength.

what is formula to calculate the wavelength if Velocity Factor is 0.66
and Er=1.2 for example
 
edieber said:
do you know if it influence the wavelength? :confused:

ou have to be clearer 'cos I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about: what exactly are we delaing with? are we dealing with an electrical signal through a wire?
 
jcsd said:
ou have to be clearer 'cos I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about: what exactly are we delaing with? are we dealing with an electrical signal through a wire?

yes! electrical signal through a wire
 
  • #10
You'd do a lot, lot better to post this on the engineering forum, but:

wavelength = velocity factor*(the speed of light in a vacuum/frequency)
 
  • #11
jcsd said:
You'd do a lot, lot better to post this on the engineering forum, but:

wavelength = velocity factor*(the speed of light in a vacuum/frequency)

where do you take under consideration the Er ?
 
  • #12
What is 'Er'?
 
  • #13
jcsd said:
What is 'Er'?

Code:
[tex]\epsilon_r[/tex]
dialectrical coefficient
 
  • #14
I'll have to say I don't know how you'd go about calcualting or even if you can calculate it from the velcoity factor and the dialectric cooefficient ,though I think your not after the wavelength but the reflection coefficient.
 
  • #15
\lambda_{observed} = \lambda_{source} \sqrt { \frac {1-\frac {v}{c}}{1+\frac {v}{c}}
 
  • #16
Tide said:
\lambda_{observed} = \lambda_{source} \sqrt { \frac {1-\frac {v}{c}}{1+\frac {v}{c}}

why you don't take under consideration \epsilon_r
the dialectrical element
 
  • #17
edieber said:
why you don't take under consideration \epsilon_r
the dialectrical element

Because I don't fully understand your question. If you are talking about a transmitter and a receiver that are in relative motion with respect to each other then I presume the signal is propagating through empty space or possibly air whose dielectric constant is very close to 1. It doesn't make sense to me that one end of a cable would be moving relative to the other if that's the medium you are talking about.
 
  • #18
I think he's talking about the velocity of signal transmission along a coaxial cable, or possibly a transmission line.

as in for instance

http://www.nr6ca.org/vf.html

If so, the velocity factor should be approximately c/sqrt(Er), where Er is the permitivity of the dielectric material relative to the permitivitty of free space.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
pervect said:
I think he's talking about the velocity of signal transmission along a coaxial cable, or possibly a transmission line.

as in for instance

http://www.nr6ca.org/vf.html

If so, the velocity factor should be approximately c/sqrt(Er), where Er is the permitivity of the dielectric material relative to the permitivitty of free space.

Oh, okay! I've never heard it called a "velocity factor."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
pervect said:
I think he's talking about the velocity of signal transmission along a coaxial cable, or possibly a transmission line.

as in for instance

http://www.nr6ca.org/vf.html

If so, the velocity factor should be approximately c/sqrt(Er), where Er is the permitivity of the dielectric material relative to the permitivitty of free space.

how come if Er=1.24 put it in the formula c/sqrt(Er) it never will be vf=0.666 for example :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top