Velocity of a block attached to a pulley and cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a block attached to a pulley and cylinder system after descending 1.5 meters. The participants explore the relationships between angular and linear accelerations, emphasizing the need to derive equations for the tensions and accelerations involved. A conservation of energy approach is suggested as a more straightforward method to find the solution, linking gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy for the block, pulley, and cylinder. The importance of maintaining a taut rope and the connection between the components' speeds is highlighted. Overall, the conversation focuses on clarifying the necessary equations and methods to solve the problem effectively.
whonut
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cylinder and pulley turn without friction about stationary horizontal axles that pass through their centres. A light rope is wrapped around the cylinder, passes over the pulley, and has a 3.00 kg box suspended from its free end. There is no slipping between the rope and the pulley surface. The uniform cylinder has mass 5.00 kg and radius 40.0 cm. The pulley is a uniform disk with mass 2.00 kg and radius 20.0 cm. The box is released from rest and descends as the rope unwraps from the cylinder. EDIT: Question is: What is the velocity of the block when it has descended 1.5m?

Homework Equations



$$\vec{\tau} = \vec{r} \times \vec{F} = I\vec{\alpha}$$
$$I = \frac{1}{2}MR^2$$
$$\alpha=\frac{a}{R}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I have expressions for the angular accelerations of the 2 discs in terms of the tensions. ##Var_C## stands for some variable with respect to the cylinder, ##Var_B## is the same for the block and ##Var_P## is the same for the pulley.

$$\alpha_C = \frac{2T_2)}{M_{C}R_C}$$
$$\alpha_P = \frac{2(T_{1}-T_2)}{M_{P}R_P}$$

Where I get stuck is how to somehow combine those angular accelerations in order to then convert into a linear acceleration for the block. I've solved this problem by energy conservation but I really need to understand this method.

Hope I've not many faux pas, thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expressions for the angular accelerations of the pulley and cylinder look fine. But what is the question? What are you trying to calculate?
 
gneill said:
Your expressions for the angular accelerations of the pulley and cylinder look fine. But what is the question? What are you trying to calculate?
Oh hell. Copied the set up and not the question! Apologies. I've edited the original post.
 
whonut said:
Question is: What is the velocity of the block when it has descended 1.5m?
Ah. So you're looking for the linear acceleration of the box then.

What's the relationship between the angular acceleration of a pulley (or wheel, or cylinder,...) and the tangential acceleration? HInt: it involves the radius.
 
Yet another error in my OP. I put that in but screwed up the LaTeX. It's ##a=\alpha{r}##, right? My first thought was that the linear acceleration of the box was just the sum of the 2 cylinders' linear accelerations but I can't get the tension terms to go away. Is it just my algebra?
 
The tangential accelerations of the pulley and cylinder are "tied" to that of the rope. Use the angular vs linear tangential relationship to convert the angular accelerations their tangential counterparts.

You need another equation for acceleration, namely that of the box. After all, it's the box's weight that's providing the motivating force for the system. Then you'll have three equations in three unknowns (a, T1, T2).
 
I am so bad at forums! It's ##T_1-mg=ma##, I believe. Can I solve it from there?
 
Last edited:
Note that you might also consider a conservation of energy approach to the problem. When the box has descended by the given amount, the change in gravitational PE will go into the box's KE and the rotational KE of the pulley and cylinder.
 
whonut said:
I am so bad at forums! It's ##T_1-3g=ma##, I believe. Can I solve it from there?
You'll have to show how you got there. But off hand I'd say no... You don't know what T1 is.
 
  • #10
I've done the energy thing. Much more straightforward but less apparently less general. I got it from the fact that T1 and mg are the only forces on the block & result in the acceleration. Am I wrong there?
 
  • #11
whonut said:
I've done the energy thing. Much more straightforward but less apparently less general. I got it from the fact that T1 and mg are the only forces on the block & result in the acceleration. Am I wrong there?
It's actually a very powerful method which allows you to skip over all the intervening kinematics in going from initial to final state.

The only assumptions you need to make are that the change in gravitational PE for the box ends up as kinetic energy for all three moving items, and that the rope stays taught and links all their speeds.

If you show your work we can check it over.
 
Back
Top