Velocity of a charged particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a negatively charged particle released from outside a charged cylinder with a specific density distribution. The user initially attempts to derive the velocity using Newton's second law but struggles with the changing force due to the variable electric field. They shift their approach to calculating electric potential energy, using the relationship between potential difference and kinetic energy. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly determining the potential at the cylinder's axis and acknowledges that the potential cannot be assumed to be zero at infinity in this scenario. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the velocity can be derived from the potential difference between the initial and final positions of the charge.
Kosta1234
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Velocity of charged particle
Relevant Equations
$$ \vec E \cdot \vec A = \rho (r) dV / \varepsilon _0 $$
Hi.
I will be glad if you can help me with a small problem.

I got a cylinder with a density $$ \rho (r) = b \cdot e^{\lambda r} $$, with radius $$ R $$.
If I let go a charge q < 0 from $$ R_0 $$ when $$ R_0 > R $$ , what will be the velocity that the charge will hit the axis of the cylinder.So I did the following:
I found the Electiric Field in space:

$$ \vec E = \frac {b}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda r -1)\cdot e^{\lambda r} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r<R$$
$$ \vec E = \frac {b}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r>R$$so that

$$ \vec F = \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda r -1)\cdot e^{\lambda r} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r<R$$
$$ \vec F = \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {{{(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r> R $$and now I want to use the second Newton's law:

$$ F = \frac {dv}{dt} $$
the problem is that I got an 'r' in the integral, can I solve the differential equation just like:

$$ \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2})dt = dv $$

$$ (\frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2}) t dt = dx $$
$$ t^2 / 2 = \frac {dx}{(\frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2})} $$I'm a little bit confused because the force is changing along the distance

Thanks!. sorry that the latex didn't work in the end.. I've not idea what's wrong there
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Kosta1234 said:
sorry that the latex didn't work in the end..
Doesn't matter: at that point you were off the rails already :smile:

First of all, check your relevant equation: you can't have a differential on one side only !

Then: is the problem statement correct ? How does a charge reach the axis instead of bumping into the cylinder at ##R## ?

Then: as you say, the force changes. Don't we have something more useful to consider in such a case ?

Would you do all this match for a charge q > 0 when asked for the ultimate speed, or use a different approach 😉 ?
 
Kosta1234 said:
$$ \vec F = \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r> R $$and now I want to use the second Newton's law:

$$ F = \frac {dv}{dt} $$
the problem is that I got an 'r' in the integral, can I solve the differential equation just like:

$$ \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2})dt = dv $$

$$ (\frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2}) t dt = dx $$
$$ t^2 / 2 = \frac {dx}{(\frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2})} $$I'm a little bit confused because the force is changing along the distance

Thanks!. sorry that the latex didn't work in the end.. I've not idea what's wrong there Three {{{ instead of one
 
I forgot to say that the cylinder is not solid.

and yes, my relevant equation is:

$$ \int \vec E \cdot d \vec A = \iiint \frac {\rho (r) dV}{\varepsilon _0 } $$

I tried a different approach now..
to calculate the potential in space, and from that the electric potential energy.

and then $$ \Delta U = \frac {1}{2}mv^2 $$
so that is:
$$ q \cdot ( \phi (0) - \phi(R_0) ) = \frac {1}{2}mv^2 $$

I think there is a problem with because there will be $$ ln(r) $$ in the phrase of the potential, and I can't put there r=0
 
Muuuuuch better ! And you know the potential at the axis, don't you ?
 
Hmm

If I got those two:

$$ \vec E_1 = \frac {b}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda r -1)\cdot e^{\lambda r} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r<R $$
$$ \vec E_2 = \frac {b}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r>R $$so I can calculate the potential

$$ \phi (0) = -\int_{R_0}^{R} {E_2 \cdot dr} - \int_R^0 E_1 \cdot dr $$
$$ \phi (R_0) = -\int_{\infty}^{R_0} E_2 \cdot dr $$
$$ U = q(\phi(0) - \phi(R_0) = 1/2mv^2 $$

What do you say?
 
BvU said:
And you know the potential at the axis, don't you ?
Perhaps that was a bit optimistic with the given charge density.

I agree with the relevant equation. Left is E A -- how do you work out the right for r = R ?
 
BvU said:
Left is E A -- how do you work out the right for r = R ?
never mind -- I'm a bit slow, but I'm with you. ##\phi## is the way to go.
 
But not towards infinity -- this is one of the cases where V can't be zero at infinity.
 
  • #10
Oh ok. so I can say that in general point $$ \phi(R_0) = 0 $$ so the answer will be:
$$ q \cdot \phi(0) = 1/2mv^2 $$ ?
 
  • #11
I think so, yes. Or at 0, or at ##R## -- all you need is a potential difference
 
  • #12
Thank you!
 
Back
Top