Velocity of boat in river with varying current

s_j_sawyer
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attached.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I originally began by assuming the rate was constant, obtaining the equations

V_x^2 + V_y^2 = 1

\tan{\sigma} = \frac{V_y}{V_x}

with the assumptions

V_x(\sigma) = f(\sigma)
V_y(\sigma) = r + g(\sigma)

and used the above equations to solve for f and g, and ended up getting the correct result for f, i.e.

f(\sigma) = \cos{\sigma}

but did not get the right result for g(\sigma).

Then I realize that the path was CURVED, hence there had to be acceleration involved, and upon reading other parts of the question figured out that we were not supposed to make the assumption that r was constant. i.e. it turns out

r = r(x)

and I am unsure about how to deal with this to get the correct result

V_x(\sigma) = \cos{\sigma}
V_y(\sigma) = r + \sin{\sigma}

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • boat question.png
    boat question.png
    37.1 KB · Views: 515
Physics news on Phys.org
Sigma is not the steering angle, right? Because if it was just the angle, you would not know enough to determine the velocity of the boat. So I take it sigma is the velocity of the boat relative to the water.

And if sigma is the velocity, and if I understand correctly, there is nothing to calculate. For surely, if it was not necessary for the question to say that sigma is a velocity, it was expected for you to have some physics intuition. So you can use that same intuition to supply the formulas without proof. So I would move on to part B.

I think I don't understand what the intent of the question was.
 
Last edited:
Well \sigma is the steering angle... my professor told us just to assume the boat had a constant speed, which is why I introduced the formula

V_x^2 + V_y^2 = 1^2

and in thus doing so assumed the speed to simply be 1.

Can someone read the question and see if I'm interpreting something wrong here?
 
Nevermind I got it. I was overthinking it apparently...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top