Velocity of Light in Accelerating Spaceship & Inertial Frames in GR

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratzinger
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of light in the context of an accelerating spaceship and the nature of inertial frames in General Relativity (GR). It explores how acceleration affects the measurement of light's velocity and the implications of local versus non-local frames in both space and time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the velocity of light measured by an accelerating spaceship will always be c, but there may be a frequency shift observed due to the acceleration.
  • Others argue that the concept of local frames in GR implies that inertial frames are only valid for small regions in both space and time, suggesting that the effects of gravity must be negligible over the measurement period.
  • A participant mentions that the acceleration in a gravitational field increases as one approaches a massive body, necessitating measurements to be made over short time intervals to maintain the validity of local inertial frames.
  • Another participant questions why time also needs to be considered local if space is local, seeking clarification on the necessity of small elevators existing for short times to remain inertial.
  • Some contributions highlight that the inhomogeneity of a gravitational field complicates the definition of global inertial frames, suggesting that a uniform gravitational field would be required for broader inertial frames to exist.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of acceleration on the measurement of light's velocity and the nature of inertial frames. There is no consensus on the necessity of local time in addition to local space, nor on the conditions required for defining inertial frames in a gravitational context.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include assumptions about the uniformity of gravitational fields and the implications of spacetime curvature, which remain unresolved. The necessity for measurements to be made over short time intervals due to changing gravitational potentials is also a point of contention.

Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
1.What happens to the velocity of light measured by a spaceship that is in accelerating motion away from the light source ( light source and spaceship on the x-line)?

2. Inertial frames are only defined locally in GR. That means the falling elevator has to be small. But I think local also means just for short amount time. Why is that? Why local in time?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An event is by definition a point in Minkowski space-time. The elevator at some height above the ground whilst accelerating is an event that occurs at a point in time. Something that lasts a period of time consists of a set of events. Events have to be local in time and space. That and space-time in GR is a pesudo-Riemannian manifold, where the curvature is not limited to merely space but time also, and so the time measured in some extended non-local region will differ to that in a local frame of reference.
 
Question 1: The accelerating spaceship is no different than a local G field. SR presupposes that at any instant photons will always be measured to pass the ship at a measured velocity c - but there will be a frequency shift just as there would be if the spaceship were standing still in a comparable G field.

Guestion 2 - In a G field the acceleration increases as the object moves closer, so any measurements must be made in a short amount of time because the G potential is continually changing
 
Ratzinger said:
1.What happens to the velocity of light measured by a spaceship that is in accelerating motion away from the light source ( light source and spaceship on the x-line)?
It will always be c.

Incidentally, if the spaceship is unformly accelerating for all eternity, it will observe the frequency of the light constantly decreasing towards zero. It will only receive a finite amount of the light transmitted by the source.

(Analysis done in SR)



Ratzinger said:
2. Inertial frames are only defined locally in GR. That means the falling elevator has to be small. But I think local also means just for short amount time. Why is that? Why local in time?
For the same reason local in space: "negligible" effects accumulate and become non-negligible over an extended period of time.
 
thanks!

but...

In a G field the acceleration increases as the object moves closer, so any measurements must be made in a short amount of time because the G potential is continually changing

The field is getting stronger the closer the elevator gets to the planet surface. So that alone makes the field inhomogeneous and spacetime curved ( very slightly) and necessitates a very small elevators also to exist only for short times in order to be inertial?

A gravity field had not to vary with direction (as for spherical mass objects) and not to fall off with distance to allow 'more' global inertial frames free falling in it. Or not?
 
Hello?!

I'm still not fully clear why also time needs to be local if already space is local. Why the elevator is required to be small and to exist only for short times.

Any input is apreciated.

thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K