Velocity of particle leaving wedge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height attained by a sphere released from a wedge. Initially, there was confusion regarding the conservation of momentum and energy, leading to incorrect height calculations. After clarifying that the wedge is on a frictionless surface, participants corrected the height to be ##\frac{5}{6}R## instead of the initially proposed ##\frac{10R}{11}##. The direction of the sphere's velocity upon leaving the wedge was also debated, confirming it is tangential to the arc, which affects its trajectory. Ultimately, the consensus is that the problem may contain a misprint in the answer key.
WubbaLubba Dubdub
Messages
24
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In the given figure, a wedge of mass 2m is lying at rest on a horizontal surface. The wedge has a cavity which is the portion of a sphere of radius R. A small sphere of mass m is released from the top edge of the cavity to slide down. All surfaces are smooth.Prove the maximum height acquired by the sphere after breaking off from the wedge is ##\frac{10R}{11}## (from the point B)
question 2.jpg

[Paraphrased]

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Let the velocity of the sphere at the point where the sphere leaves the wedge be ##v## and that of the wedge be ##v_w##, then conserving energy, we get $$mgR = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}2mv_{w}^{2} + mg\frac{R}{2}$$
also conserving momentum along the x axis
$$2mv_w = mvcos(\frac{\pi}{3})$$
(Since the angle the tangent at point C makes with the horizontal is 60 degrees)
solving these, I get $$v^2 = \frac{8}{9}gR$$
and hence max height is ##\frac{4}{9}R + \frac{R}{2} = \frac{17}{18}R##
where am I going wrong here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
WubbaLubba Dubdub said:
... also conserving momentum along the x-axis ...
Why is momentum conserved along the x-axis? Gravity is not the only external force on the sphere. The cavity surface exerts a variable normal force that has both x and y components.

On edit: I misread the problem. I suppose that the horizontal surface on which the wedge lies is frictionless so that the horizontal momentum of wedge + ball is conserved. That was not clear after my initial reading of the problem.
 
Last edited:
WubbaLubba Dubdub said:
hence max height is ##\frac{4}{9}R + \frac{R}{2} = \frac{17}{18}R##

The velocity of sphere as it leaves the wedge is not vertical . Are you sure factor of 4/9 in the first term is correct ?
 
Vibhor said:
The velocity of sphere as it leaves the wedge is not vertical . Are you sure factor of 4/9 in the first term is correct ?
You're right. The factor should be ##\frac{1}{3}R## yielding maximum height to be ##\frac{5}{6}R##
 
WubbaLubba Dubdub said:
You're right. The factor should be ##\frac{1}{3}R## yielding maximum height to be ##\frac{5}{6}R.##
Which is what I get.
 
WubbaLubba Dubdub said:
You're right. The factor should be ##\frac{1}{3}R## yielding maximum height to be ##\frac{5}{6}R##

I also get same answer . It might be possible , the answer 10R/12 is misprinted as 10R/11.
 
Vibhor said:
I also get same answer . It might be possible , the answer 10R/12 is misprinted as 10R/11.
It might be the case, or the sphere might not be leaving at 60 degrees at all, since the wedge is also moving backward with some velocity(acceleration?).
 
Come to think of it, I don't really have a justification that the sphere will move tangentially to the arc at the point it leaves, save for an analogy with the case of uniform circular motion, which is certainly not happening here, but if not tangential, then which direction would the sphere take? Is the answer key simply wrong? Am I overthinking this?
 
WubbaLubba Dubdub said:
I don't really have a justification that the sphere will move tangentially to the arc at the point it leaves
It will be tangential to the arc, with the arc as frame of reference. But the arc is moving, so it will not be at 60 degrees to the horizontal.
 
  • Like
Likes WubbaLubba Dubdub, kuruman and Vibhor
  • #10
haruspex said:
It will be tangential to the arc, with the arc as frame of reference. But the arc is moving, so it will not be at 60 degrees to the horizontal.

Brilliant !

This gives you the correct result .
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
It will be tangential to the arc, with the arc as frame of reference. But the arc is moving, so it will not be at 60 degrees to the horizontal.
Of course!
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
It will be tangential to the arc, with the arc as frame of reference. But the arc is moving, so it will not be at 60 degrees to the horizontal.
Thank you so much!
 
  • #13
Thanks Vibhor and kuruman
 
Back
Top