Velocity, Period, and Transverse Wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a transverse wave to travel a combined string of length 3L under tension F, with varying mass per unit lengths for each segment. The correct approach involves determining the wave speed for each segment based on its mass per unit length, rather than simply summing the densities. The total time is derived by calculating the time for the wave to traverse each segment individually and then summing these times. The final expression for the time taken is (7L/2)*sqrt(mu_1/F). Understanding the contribution of each segment's mass per unit length is crucial for arriving at the correct factor in the calculation.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three pieces of string, each of length L, are joined together end-to-end, to make a combined string of length . The first piece of string has mass per unit length mu_1, the second piece has mass per unit length mu_1*4.00 , and the third piece has mass per unit length mu_1/4.00. If the combined string is under tension F, how much time does it take a transverse wave to travel the entire length 3L? Give your answer in terms of F, mu_1, and L.



Homework Equations



v = sqrt(F/mu)
T = position/velocity = 3L/v ??


The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is (7L/2)*sqrt(mu_1/F).

I understand the sqrt portion, but I am having difficulty with the multiplicative factor.

I thought the velocity would be:

v = sqrt(F/mu_total), where mu_total = mu_1 + 4*mu_1 + .25*mu_1 = 5.25*mu_1

T = 3L/sqrt(F/5.25*mu_1) = 3L*sqrt(5.25)*sqrt(mu_1/F)

How do I get the correct factor?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The densities do not add. You need to find an expression for the time it takes for the wave to traverse each part of the string and add those to find the total time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top