Velocity vs Momentum: Kinetic Theory & Relativistic Systems

AI Thread Summary
In kinetic theory, velocity is used instead of momentum because momentum is implicitly included in the equations, particularly in the kinetic energy formula, KE = 1/2 pv. The distribution function for number density, N(x,p,t), incorporates both position and momentum vectors, defining a six-dimensional phase space. In relativistic systems, momentum is adjusted to p = mv/sqrt(1-v^2), maintaining the same number density structure. The relationship between kinetic energy and momentum is also highlighted by the equation KE = dp/dv, indicating the rate of change of momentum with respect to velocity. This understanding is crucial for generalizing kinetic theory to relativistic contexts.
TriTertButoxy
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Why is it in kinetic theory one uses the velocity variable, instead of the momentum variable? Wouldn't this cause problems when trying to generalize to relativistic systems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I understand your question.

Momentum is in the equation. It's just hiding.
You could think of the equation for kinetic energy as KE = \frac{1}{2}pv

because p = mv

I don't know if this answers your question.
 
Kinetic Theory distribution function (numbrt density) is

N(x,p,t)=dN/d^2V=dN/dVxdVp

N is the number density and it is a function of the position vector, x, the momentum vector, p, and time, t.

In a relativistic setting the number density is the same except now

p=mv/sqrt(1-v^2)

The vector space x and the momentum space p, define a 6 dimensional phase space.

Hope that helps.

Matt
 
The above equation for p in a relativistic setting only holds for a particle with zero rest mass. (travels at the speed of light)
 
Archosaur said:
I think I understand your question.

Momentum is in the equation. It's just hiding.
You could think of the equation for kinetic energy as KE = \frac{1}{2}pv

because p = mv

I don't know if this answers your question.

Also worth noting in understanding kinetic energy

is that

KE= dp/dv

or the rate of change of momentum with respect to velocity.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top