Velocity Vs. Time Graph Extension Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics lab focused on analyzing the velocity versus time graph of a toy car, which shows acceleration followed by a sudden drop to zero velocity. The group is tasked with extending their understanding of this graph and seeks explanations for the abrupt change in velocity at the end of the motion. They hypothesize that friction may be influencing the graph's behavior, despite observing that the car appears to decelerate smoothly rather than stopping abruptly. The participants are looking for insights or evidence to support their analysis of the graph and the motion it represents. Understanding the relationship between acceleration, deceleration, and external forces like friction is crucial for their lab extension.
ChEmWen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement
Capture.PNG


So I am currently working on an velocity/acceleration lab. My physics teacher requires each lab group to find an extension that goes above and beyond the question that we are supposed to answer with the lab. Each group also needs evidence to prove the extension.

That being said, the above picture is a graph of a "shake'n'go" car (a toy car that when you shake it, it moves) created using a motion detector through. As you can see the car accelerates, then decelerates. The graph looks nice, however at the end of the curve, right when the car comes to a stop, the V v T graph shoots right up to 0 (as circled in the picture).

Our lab groups extension is to figure out what that means, but we can not seem to find any sort of explanation to this.

If anyone could provide information on why this is happening (attached documents or links would work or just a simple explanation), it would be hugely appreciated. THANK you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As for what it means - read the graph and describe, using words, the motion of the car that the graph is telling you. (note - the circles curve can be approximated by three lines...)

What sort of thing causes that sort of motion?
I have a pretty good idea but I can;t actually tell you right out.
 
Well the motion described is that the car is accelerating to the left then decelerating to the left. What our group was assuming was that friction is what caused the jump in the graph. However, when we watched the car, it never appeared as if it stopped abruptly, it appeared as it was accelerating and decelerating at a constant rate.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top