Velocity with negative acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the displacement of a train decelerating at -1 m/s² from an initial velocity of 20 m/s over 40 seconds. The initial calculations suggest that the train would travel 800 meters if acceleration were ignored, but the negative acceleration complicates the situation. After 20 seconds, the train comes to a complete stop, and by 40 seconds, it would theoretically move backward, resulting in a final velocity of -20 m/s. The participants express confusion about how to mathematically represent the deceleration and its impact on displacement. Ultimately, the problem highlights the importance of considering the effects of constant acceleration over time.
PhysicsBoyMan
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Train goes 20 m/s
Brakes cause a = -1 m/s2
Displacement at t = 40s ?

Homework Equations


v = 20 m/s
a = -1 m/s2
t = 40s

The Attempt at a Solution


image.jpg

image upload no limit

It seemed like this formula fit perfectly. It had all of the known variables and the one unknown neatly out front.

The velocity is too fast and the deceleration too slow for the displacement to be 0m.

The only thing I could think of was that my delta x should have data but the initial position is 0 and the final position is unknown.

I can't imagine where such a simple problem went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If every second the train is going 1 m/s slower than it was the previous second how fast is it going after 20 seconds? Does that help?
 
  • Like
Likes PhysicsBoyMan
AndrewHolowack said:
If every second the train is going 1 m/s slower than it was the previous second how fast is it going after 20 seconds? Does that help?
Is it really that simple though?

The first part of my equation is displacement = velocity x time without regard for acceleration. Before deceleration the train would go 800m.

I'm not sure how to represent your idea mathematically. Going -1 m/s2 x 40s doesn't seem right to me.
 
Your equation is right, and so is your answer if you assume that the negative acceleration continues for the entire 40 seconds. At 20 seconds the train comes to a stop and then begins to move backwards. At 40 seconds the train is back were you began with a velocity of -20 m/s. They way the question is worded you could argue that the train will simply come to a stop at 20 seconds.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top