Vena contracta in orifice plates

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaiG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orifice Plates
AI Thread Summary
Finding the diameter of the vena contracta in gas or vapor flows through orifice plates involves using the coefficient of contraction (Cc), typically around 0.62 for sharp edge orifices. Corrections may be necessary for fluid compressibility, often calculated by multiplying Cc by an expansion factor (Y). While approximations of Cc between 0.61 and 0.64 are common, they may not suffice for precise calculations. The discussion highlights concerns about how small variations in process variables can significantly impact noise calculations in orifice plates. Accurate determination of vena contracta velocity and area is crucial for reliable decibel values.
DaiG
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, does anybody know how to find the diameter of the vena contracta in gas/vapour flows in orifice plates?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is given by the coefficient of contraction Cc = Area vena contracta / Area Orifice. The value is usually about 0.62 for a sharp edge orifice. These results may need correction for the compressibility of the fluid. To a first approximation, multiply Cc X Y where Y is the expansion factor.
 
Yea, I am aware of this method but concern is with the coefficeint Cc. Usually an approximation would be good enough and 0.61 to 0.64 usually does the trick. My issue is I am trying to develop a method for calculating a value of noise in orifice plates. approximating Cc isn't a reliable method for me because my final decibel value is thrown substantially if certain process variable differ by 0.01 decimal places and the vena contracta velocity and area are troubled areas for me. Thanks anyway though.
 

Thread 'A practical way to vaporize fuel for high MPG?'

Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
View full post »

Thread 'Technical Analysis on Titan Sub (Titanic Sub)'

TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
View full post »

Similar threads

Exit velocity of gas through two orifices
Replies
12
Views
2K
Transitional Reynolds Number When Analysing Flow Through Orifices
Replies
4
Views
1K
Why is the Orifice Plate Area 0.0058 ft²?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Pressure drop across a thick orifice
Replies
5
Views
3K
Can we increase force of an open nozzle that runs on compressed air ??
Replies
4
Views
1K
Modeling Air Compression Cylinder
Replies
45
Views
5K
Pressure across an orifice/choke plate
Replies
1
Views
4K
Calculate the pressure drop of air across an orifice?
Replies
1
Views
4K
Volumetric flow from vessel through pipe to another vessel
Replies
8
Views
3K
Pressure differential through orifice plate
Replies
6
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top