News Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has died

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Hugo Chavez, the President of Venezuela, has died, as announced by Vice President Nicolas Maduro. The announcement followed discussions among political and military leaders regarding Chavez's declining health, with Maduro suggesting a conspiracy theory about Chavez being deliberately infected with cancer. The specific type of cancer Chavez suffered from was not disclosed by the government, but experts speculate it may have been a soft-tissue sarcoma. Discussions in the thread also touch on the broader implications of Chavez's policies, including nationalization and social programs aimed at reducing poverty, which some argue led to economic decline and increased crime. The legacy of Chavez and the current state of Venezuela under Maduro are debated, with references to the country's economic struggles and the potential for further collapse. The conversation also includes comparisons to socialist policies in Europe, with participants discussing the definitions and implications of socialism in different contexts. Overall, the thread reflects a mix of mourning for Chavez, criticism of his policies, and concerns about Venezuela's future.
Physics news on Phys.org
The announcement came hours after Maduro met with the country's top political and military leaders about Chavez's worsening health condition and suggested someone may have deliberately infected Chavez with cancer.
What?
 
Evo said:
What?

That does sound weird the way it's stated, but there are some infectious causes of cancer, it would appear:

[STRIKE]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page[/STRIKE]

Fixed URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infectious_causes_of_cancer

wikipedia said:
Worldwide approximately 18% of cancers are related to infectious diseases.[1] This proportion varies in different regions of the world from high of 25% in Africa to less than 10% in the developed world.[1] Viruses are usual infectious agents that cause cancer but bacteria and parasites may also have an effect.

A virus that can cause cancer is called an oncovirus. These include human papillomavirus (cervical carcinoma), Epstein-Barr virus (B-cell lymphoproliferative disease and nasopharyngeal carcinoma), Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus (Kaposi's Sarcoma and primary effusion lymphomas), hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses (hepatocellular carcinoma), and Human T-cell leukemia virus-1 (T-cell leukemias). Bacterial infection may also increase the risk of cancer, as seen in Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric carcinoma.[2] Parasitic infections strongly associated with cancer include Schistosoma haematobium (squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder) and the liver flukes, Opisthorchis viverrini and Clonorchis sinensis (cholangiocarcinoma).[3]

EDIT -- What cancer did he die of?
 
Last edited:
berkeman said:
EDIT -- What cancer did he die of?
Prostate.
 
Evo said:
Prostate.

Hmm, that sounds a lot less likely then. Prostate cancer is mentioned at the wikipedia link, but there does not appear to be conclusive evidence:

wikipedia said:
Herpesviruses are a third group of common cancer-causing viruses. Two types of herpesviruses have been associated with cancer: the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8).[7] EBV appears to cause all nonkeratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinomas and some cases of lymphoma, including Burkitt’s lymphoma—the association is especially strong in Africa—and Hodgkin’s disease.[7] EBV has also been found in a variety of other types of cancer cells, although its role in causing these other cancers is not well established. HHV-8 causes all cases of Kaposi’s sarcoma, and has been found in some cases of a cancer-related condition called Castleman's disease.[7] Studies involving other kinds of cancer, particularly prostate cancer, have been inconsistent.[7] Both of these herpesviruses are commonly found in cancerous cells of primary effusion lymphoma.[7] Herpesviruses also cause cancer in animals, especially leukemias and lymphomas.[7]
 
Evo said:
What?

Nothing surprising for me, what kind of a message have you expected from the substitute of the man who blamed US for the Haiti earthquake?
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and mheslep
Borek said:
Nothing surprising for me, what kind of a message have you expected from the substitute of the man who blamed US for the Haiti earthquake?
Lol! I forgot that.
 
Borek said:
Nothing surprising for me, what kind of a message have you expected from the substitute of the man who blamed US for the Haiti earthquake?

Evo said:
Lol! I forgot that.
:rolleyes: I never heard that one.
 
  • #10
How long before Maduro establishes a military junta?
 
  • #11
May he rest in peace
 
  • #12
berkeman said:
What cancer did he die of?

The government never detailed the type of cancer Chavez had, but experts think it was a soft-tissue sarcoma.
 
  • #14
  • #15
I never cared for the "cult of personality" thing he had going. And nationalizing industries...whew, what an efficient way to drive investors from your country, and isolate yourself from the international community!

But I will say this about the guy: I really think he was sincere.
 
  • #16
lisab said:
But I will say this about the guy: I really think he was sincere.
I thought he was a nut, and he promoted anti-US terrorism and an Iranian ally? I guess he was sincerely an enemy of the US. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and mheslep
  • #17
A terrorist is one who makes smaller bomb.
 
  • #18
May he rest in peace. ;(
 
  • #19
  • #21
lisab said:
But I had the impression he really was concerned about the poor in his country. He just had no idea how to truly help them.
I'm not sure if he really cared or not, but he definitely knew that the way to help them (and thus himself) was to spend oil money on them.
 
  • #22
Do you know if radioactive poisoning can give you cancer? I think I read that Marie Curie died from cancer. And secret Alexander Litvinenko died not long ago from radioactive poisoning too.

I wouldn't rule out that intelligence agencies in the "first" world have technologies we wouldn't believe are possible.
 
  • #23
kaleidoscope said:
Do you know if radioactive poisoning can give you cancer? I think I read that Marie Curie died from cancer.
She died from aplastic anemia, which is not cancer.

And secret Alexander Litvinenko died not long ago from radioactive poisoning too.
He died from poisoning "lethal polonium-210-induced acute radiation syndrome", not cancer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinenko

I wouldn't rule out that intelligence agencies in the "first" world have technologies we wouldn't believe are possible.
We do not allow conspiracy theories here.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #24
I remember the report that Chavez had a soft tissue sarcoma was a wild guess by someone that never examined him or his case file. But if you believe that it was indeed a soft tissue sarcoma, you know they can be found anywhere in the body including the abdomen. Osteosarcomas are often found in the pelvic bones as well. Ewings sarcoma is frequently found in the pelvis. Chondrosarcomas are often found in the abdomen. Sarcomas are notoriously difficult to cure. Yes, Chavez was male but you don't make assumptions about cancer types based on the gender of the patient.

We found out that my daughter has mesenchymal chondrosarcoma this Jan. Hers was in an unusual location... her lower spine. We believe the tumor was completely surgically resected but this type is known to very likely metastasize and is very resistant to chemo and radiation. We're throwing everything they have at it. Crossing our fingers nothing pops up over the next 10 years.

Not a pleasant new year...
 
  • #25
OMG chemisttree, I am so sorry to hear this. I hope the best for your daughter.
 
  • #26
Thanks, Evo. Whatever course Chavez's cancer took, it likely found a place to grow in the lung or kidney... possibly the liver. He was reported to be suffering from a lung infection which is a common way to pass for those whose immune systems are compromised by the chemo treatments.
 
  • #27
Sorry to hear about you daughters problems, chemisttree. I wish you all the luck of the world.
 
  • #28
All the best for your family chemisttree, that's sad news.
lisab said:
But I had the impression he really was concerned about the poor in his country. He just had no idea how to truly help them.
He helped them in some ways; subsidised food markets, healthcare, more funding to education and even set up participatory councils to get people more involved in politics. It's not all roses of course, whilst poverty went down crime has gone up.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...f-life-improved-in-un-index-under-chavez.html
 
  • #31
Too late! It seems he's taken a 'turn' for the worse.
 
  • #32
russ_watters said:
>> But I had the impression he really was concerned about the poor in his country. He just had no idea how to truly help them.

I'm not sure if he really cared or not, but he definitely knew that the way to help them (and thus himself) was to spend oil money on them.

Today's headlines: Venezuela runs out of cash to print more money.

Where are all the lefties who just 5 years ago voiced wet dreams that Chavistas and other lefty governments of South America will show the evil empire of USA how miserable and powerless it is?

Did anyone give Bernie Sanders these news to read?

What a huge surprise. Socialism failed again. It's always such a shock. It should have worked.
No worries, they will try again. I just pray they will try it somewhere far from where I am...
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #33
nikkkom said:
Did anyone give Bernie Sanders these news to read?

Are you implying Sanders supported Chavez?

What a huge surprise. Socialism failed again.

There are many socialist countries in Europe. They are doing pretty fine. They're among the best countries to live in. Sweden, Norway, etc. That is what Sanders is going for.
 
  • #34
micromass said:
Are you implying Sanders supported Chavez?

I'm implying Sanders ideas are quite more socialistic that I am willing to tolerate.

There are many socialist countries in Europe. They are doing pretty fine.

Wrong. There are *no* socialist countries in Europe. That's part of the reason why they are doing fine.

Socialism is an economic doctrine which says that most, or even all, economic activity should be state-operated. No European country has that - in all of them, privately held businesses are the majority. (edit: I forgot Belarus. Maybe there it is a minority)
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #35
nikkkom said:
I'm implying Sanders ideas are quite more socialistic that I am willing to tolerate.
Wrong. There are *no* socialist countries in Europe. That's part of the reason why they are doing fine.

Socialism is an economic doctrine which says that most, or even all, economic activity should be state-operated. No European country has that - in all of them, privately help businesses are the majority.

Democratic socialist parties have been ruling many European countries for decades.
 
  • #36
Democratic Socialist is a party name or type. The name no more implies a policy of textbook socialism than Christian Democrat necessarily implies a party devoted to theocracy.

Actual socialist policies have been on the decline for some time among most European governments. Industries actually owned by the government occur (NHS) but have become rare, unlike the widespread nationalization that occurred in Venuzuela under Chavez that has wrecked that economy. Britain began adopting private highways. Even Sweden has allowed universal access to private education in grade schools (state funded), up I think to 14% there last I looked.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #37
mheslep said:
Democratic Socialist is a party name.

Yes, it is. But there's the difference between Americans and Europeans. When an American has to name a socialist, it would be Chavez or Marx. But when European are asked to name a socialist, it would be social democrats who take part in government every single day in Europe. Chavez and Marx would be named communists instead. Like it or not, but that's the way we use the term "socialist" in Europe nowadays.
 
  • #38
micromass said:
...Like it or not, but that's the way we use the term "socialist" in Europe nowadays.
Apparently not. Nikkkom is european. Furthermore, he or she took the trouble to define exactly what was meant in using the term in connection to this thread on Chavez. A digression on what 310 million "Americans" think or what Europeans think can only confuse or derail discussion of the socialistic policies implemented by Chavez, their legacy, and similarities to government policies elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #39
mheslep said:
Apparently not. Nikkkom is european. Furthermore, he or she took the trouble to define exactly what was meant in using the term in connection to this thread on Chavez. A digression on what 310 million "Americans" think or what Europeans think can only confuse or derail discussion of the socialistic policies implemented by Chavez, their legacy, and similarities to government policies elsewhere.

It's very relevant, since not everybody thinks the same thing when they hear "socialism". Whatever the original historic meaning was, for many the meaning has changed for many.
 
  • #40
micromass said:
Democratic socialist parties have been ruling many European countries for decades.

Can you give a few specific examples of "Democratic socialist" parties ruling in Europe?
To be precise: not "Social Democrats" (social is not the same as socialist), but "Socialist Democrats" or "Democratic socialists".
 
  • #41
nikkkom said:
Can you give a few specific examples of "Democratic socialist" parties ruling in Europe?
To be precise: not "Social Democrats" (social is not the same as socialist), but "Socialist Democrats" or "Democratic socialists".

I do mean social democrats (and not the Leninist democratic socialism). And 99.9% of people I know and talk to every day identify "socialist" with "social democrat".
 
  • #42
micromass said:
I do mean social democrats (and not the Leninist democratic socialism). And 99.9% of people I know and talk to every day identify "socialist" with "social democrat".

Looks like you conveniently moved the goalposts as it suits you.
 
  • #43
nikkkom said:
Looks like you conveniently moved the goalposts as it suits you.

I'm sad my posts appear to do that to you. I had no intention of doing that.
 
  • #44
Exchange rate in Venezuela
 

Attachments

  • CY_hihmUMAAwbhm.jpg
    CY_hihmUMAAwbhm.jpg
    51.3 KB · Views: 439
  • #45
Do we need a new thread on the dismal legacy of Hugo Chavez and his successor Nicolás Maduro.

Apparently the Chinese can't make it work. Chinese bullet train in Venezuela stalls as alliance derails
https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinese-bullet-train-venezuela-stalls-alliance-derails-050357015.html

ZARAZA, Venezuela (AP) — It was once billed as a model of socialist fraternity: South America's first high-speed train, powered by Chinese technology, crisscrossing Venezuela to bring development to its backwater plains. Now all but abandoned, it has become a symbol of economic collapse — and a strategic relationship gone adrift.

Where dozens of modern buildings once stood, cattle now graze on grass growing amid the rubble of the project's gutted and vandalized factory. A red arched sign in Chinese and Spanish is all that remains of what until 16 months ago was a bustling complex of 800 workers.

Meanwhile - Venezuela crisis: Maduro threatens seizure of closed factories
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-36294939

A top International Monetary Fund economist says Venezuela could reach “total economic collapse” in 12-18 months.
Judging from similar cases in Latin America, it’s hard to see how President Nicolas Maduro can finish his term in 2019.
Democracies in the region should collectively press Maduro to respect democratic rules, and avoid a military coup.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/andres-oppenheimer/article73657547.html

U.S. intelligence warns Venezuela is on the verge of collapse
http://www.latimes.com/nation/ct-us-intelligence-venezuela-collapse-20160514-story.html
With dire shortages of basic goods, a looming foreign debt payment, horrific street crime and intransigent political divisions, Venezuela is in danger of collapsing into waves of deadly violence, U.S. intelligence officials warned Friday.

Venezuela, which controls the world's largest reserves of crude oil, is in the throes of a potentially explosive political stalemate after opposition parties gained a majority in the national congress in elections late last year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #46
Astronuc said:
Do we need a new thread on the dismal legacy of Hugo Chavez and his successor Nicolás Maduro.
Yet the outcome of misery never seems to deter people from applauding the policies of these socialists, regardless of how many https://panampost.com/sabrina-martin/2016/05/04/in-venezuela-residents-resort-to-hunting-dogs-on-the-street/

Current UK labor party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, 2013:
Thanks Hugo Chavez for showing that the poor matter and wealth can be shared. He made massive contributions to Venezuela & a very wide world

US President Carter, 2013:
President Chávez will be remembered for his bold assertion of autonomy and independence for Latin American governments and for his formidable communication skills and personal connection with supporters in his country and abroad to whom he gave hope and empowerment. During his 14-year tenure, Chávez joined other leaders in Latin America and the Caribbean to create new forms of integration. Venezuelan poverty rates were cut in half, and millions received identification documents for the first time allowing them to participate more effectively in their country's economic and political life.

The Nation editor, Katrina vanden Heuvel, 2006:
...how many know that he laid out an innovative four-point program to renew and reform the UN--and spoke eloquently about how and why this "era is giving birth to a heart"?

The usual cheering from Hollywood, i.e. Michael Moore and Sean Penn has become a cliche.

http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/2012/08/07/sean-penn/sean_penn_hugo_chavez_venezuela.jpg

Maybe Penn should eat a little dog before flying off to hug the next socialist authoritarian.

WSJ commentary
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #47
I created a generic "Venezuela news" thread

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/venezuela-news.872274/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #48
Astronuc said:
Do we need a new thread on the dismal legacy of Hugo Chavez and his successor Nicolás Maduro.

I created a generic "Venezuela news" thread, but it was deleted. ?!
 
  • #49
nikkkom said:
I created a generic "Venezuela news" thread, but it was deleted. ?!
There was an image of a stack of Venezuelan notes and one US $100 note. There was a single comment about exchange rate, but no other commentary. Opening posts in a thread require more substantive information, much like an abstract to a journal article or an introductory section of an essay.

The story in Venezuela is one of corruption and mismanagement, as opposed to reform - or how to wreck a nation, or crash a ship of state upon the rocks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
7K
Replies
31
Views
10K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top