Verifying Energy-Time Uncertainty Principle for Particle in Infinite Well

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
Gale
Messages
682
Reaction score
2
Consider the wavefunction: particle in an infinite well of width L, with
wavefunction given as a superposition of two energy eigenstates, with quantum numbers n=1 and m=2. Show that the Energy-Time uncertainty principle, applied to the time it takes <x> to change by an
amount σx, indeed holds true in this case.

soo, i have <x> and σx, and i guess i can find σE by doing sqrt(<E>^2 + <E^2>), i just don't see how I'm supposed to use those values for the uncertainty principle which says ΔE*Δt< hbar/2.

help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gale said:
soo, i have <x> and σx,

OK so you should have &lt;x&gt; as some function of t, right? So set the problem up like this (insert the function of time you found in place of my f(t)).

&lt;x&gt;=f(t)

&lt;x&gt;+\sigma x=f(t+\Delta t)

From there you are supposed to solve for \Delta t.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top