Verifying identity involving covariant derivative

demonelite123
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
i am trying to verify the following identity:
0 = ∂g_mn / ∂y^p + Γ ^s _pm g_sn + Γ ^r _pn g_mr

where Γ is the christoffel symbol with ^ telling what is the upper index and _ telling what are the two lower indices. g_mn is the metric tensor with 2 lower indices and y^p is the component of y the partial derivative is being taken with respect to. basically this equality shows that the covariant derivative of the metric tensor is 0.

so i expanded the christoffel symbols out according to the definition and the g^sd included in the first christoffel symbol cancels with the g_sn multiplying the first christoffel symbol and i get δ ^d _n where δ is the kronecker delta with upper index d and lower index n. i do something similar for the second christoffel symbol. i use the fact that the metric tensor is symmetric and that the christoffel symbols are symmetric with respect to their lower indices so in the end i get:
0 = 2 (∂g_mn / ∂y^p) after the rest cancel out.

so what i am stuck on is how to show that the right side equals the left side. did i do something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes for a type (0,2) tensor i.e. all the indecies downstairs you subtract the Christoffel symbols not add them. You add them when you have upstairs indecies so your equation should be

0 = ∂g_mn / ∂y^p - Γ ^s _pm g_sn - Γ ^r _pn g_mr

I believe that takes care of your problem
 
sgd37 said:
yes for a type (0,2) tensor i.e. all the indecies downstairs you subtract the Christoffel symbols not add them. You add them when you have upstairs indecies so your equation should be

0 = ∂g_mn / ∂y^p - Γ ^s _pm g_sn - Γ ^r _pn g_mr

I believe that takes care of your problem

ah i see, thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top