Verifying Lorentz Algebra with Clifford/Dirac Algebra

  • Thread starter Thread starter Onamor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Lorentz
Onamor
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Paraphrasing Peskin and Schroeder:

By repeated use of
\left\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^{\nu} \right\}= 2 g^{\mu\nu} \times \textbf{1}_{n \times n} (Clifford/Dirac algebra),
verify that the n-dimensional representation of the Lorentz algebra,
S^{\mu \nu}=\frac{i}{4}\left[\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\right],
satisfies the commutation relation
\left[J^{\mu \nu},J^{\rho \sigma}\right]=i\left(g^{\nu \rho}J^{\mu \sigma}-g^{\mu \rho}J^{\nu \sigma}-g^{\nu \sigma}J^{\mu \rho}+g^{\mu \sigma}J^{\nu \rho}\right).

I've tried many lengthy computations and always seem to be missing something.
Most obvious thing to try is just
\left[S^{\mu \nu},S^{\rho \sigma}\right]=S^{\mu \nu}S^{\rho \sigma}-S^{\rho \sigma}S^{\mu \nu}=\frac{-1}{16}\left(\left[\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\right]\left[\gamma^{\rho},\gamma^{\sigma}\right]-\left[\gamma^{\rho},\gamma^{\sigma}\right]\left[\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\right]\right)
=\frac{-1}{16}\left(\left(\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}-\gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\mu}\right)\left(\gamma^{\rho}\gamma^{\sigma}-\gamma^{\sigma}\gamma^{\rho}\right)-\left(\gamma^{\rho}\gamma^{\sigma}-\gamma^{\sigma}\gamma^{\rho}\right)\left(\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}-\gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\mu}\right)\right)
=\frac{-1}{16}\left( \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu} \gamma^{\rho} \gamma^{\sigma} - \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu} \gamma^{\sigma} \gamma^{\rho} - \gamma^{\nu} \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\rho} \gamma^{\sigma} + \gamma^{\nu} \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\sigma} \gamma^{\rho} - \gamma^{\rho} \gamma^{\sigma} \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu} + \gamma^{\rho} \gamma^{\sigma} \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu} + \gamma^{\sigma} \gamma^{\rho} \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu} - \gamma^{\sigma} \gamma^{\rho} \gamma^{\nu} \gamma^{\mu} \right)

and then I've tried a few different commutation relations but to no avail.
Would be very grateful for any help in finishing this off.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


This is indeed a difficult computation. You must cheat in a way, in the sense that you already know what the final answer looks like. So the the LHS with those 8 terms must lead to the RHS which has also 8 terms (4 times J, but each J has 2 times gammas). The g's will appear when you use the clifford algebra as

\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu} = 2g^{\mu\nu}-\gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\mu}

So try to group the 8 terms of 4 gammas into the desired form according to how the J's indices occur in the RHS of what you're trying to prove.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top