Vertical Asymptote of f(x) = 2x/sin2x

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the vertical asymptotes of the function f(x) = 2x/sin(2x). Participants express confusion regarding the function's behavior at points where the denominator approaches zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions under which vertical asymptotes occur, particularly focusing on the zeros of the sine function and the implications for the function's numerator.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the function's vertical asymptotes, with participants identifying specific points where the denominator is zero and questioning the behavior of the numerator at those points. Some guidance has been provided regarding the periodic nature of the sine function and the implications for vertical asymptotes.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the function has an infinite number of vertical asymptotes due to the periodicity of the sine function, while also discussing the relevance of limits in determining the behavior at points of interest.

gator
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Question: Find the Vertical Asymptote if any

f(x)=[tex}\frac{2x}{\sin2x}[\tex]

Im somewhat lost, I cross multi and get 1/2 although my friends tell me this just equals 1. Any ideas?

err...cant get the cool math symbol things to work...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you clarify the function? The LaTeX didn't work properly, check your tags.
 
im trying to say f(x)= 2x / sin2x
 
Use the correct tags (closing with /, not \) and click to see the source:

[tex]\frac{2x}{\sin2x}[/tex]

Now, you can encounter a vertical asymptote if the denominator becomes zero for some value of x while the nominator is non-zero there.
If both are zero, you can check with a limit what the function becomes.
 
The only thing that would have the denom zero would be zero (sin2(o)) = 0
but that would cause the nom to become zero
 
Both become zero there indeed, in which case you can't tell (yet) if there will be a vertical asymptote. Have you covered limits?
You forgot one thing though, the sine-function becomes zero somewhere else (of course, it's period with period [itex]2\pi[/itex], but it has another zero within [0,[itex]2\pi[/itex]]). Think about the trigonometric unit circle, when is the sine zero as well?
 
sin = zero @ pi (180* on unit circle)

yep, covered limits. But in our notes he covers finding the VA without using limits (weird i know) so I am not sure
 
gator said:
sin = zero @ pi (180* on unit circle)

yep, covered limits. But in our notes he covers finding the VA without using limits (weird i know) so I am not sure
Indeed, at [itex]x = \pi[/itex] as well! And the nominator doesn't become zero there, so we have a real vertical asymptote here.
Of course, don't forget the sin(x) is periodic, so not only at [itex]x = \pi[/itex] but also at...? And the nominator only became zero at x = 0, but the denominator became zero there, so also at multiples of [itex]2 \pi[/itex] where the nominator doesn't become zero anymore!
Can you follow?

Perhaps you saw a standard limit you may use for the 0/0 case, which is the well-known:

[tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 0} \frac{{\sin x}}{x} = 1[/tex]
 
So my VA is x=pi ?
 
  • #10
gator said:
So my VA is x=pi ?
There's one yes, but there are more. Reread my last reply, I edited while you were posting.
 
  • #11
sin2x is zero when x=1/2 pi ? since that would mean sin = pi which would be zero on the denom
 
  • #12
Well, sin(x) is a periodic function with period [itex]2\pi[/itex]. This means that if it becomes zero at x = 0, it also becomes zero when you add a multiple of [itex]2\pi[/itex]. The same goes for the case [itex]x = \pi[/itex].

So we have that sin(x) becomes zero at: [itex]x = 0 + 2k\pi \vee x = \pi + 2k\pi[/itex] where k is an integer. Now, the nominator is non-zero in all those cases, except for x = 0 (but not for its multiples of [itex]2\pi[/itex]). So if we leave out x = 0 in the x values I listed, then we have all the places where a vertical asymptote occurs. You see?
 
  • #13
ok, i have you until the last sentsnce. if "k" is an interger, then the amount of VA's i could have is endless.

Im also a little lost on what i should write down on my assignment

by the way, thanks for all this help
 
  • #14
Well, you're right! This function has an infinite number of vertical asymptotes!
 
  • #15
lol yea!

now are you any good at continuity? I have a question

using the def. of continuity to determine the points at which the function is no continuous and indicate whether the discontinuity is removable or not

f(x) = HUGE bracket (x+1)absolute value x-2 all over 2 sqrt x+1 x<0
1 x=0
-e^x / x+2 x>0

I have no notes on continuity, so if you could just lead me to a good site if you don't have time to help then that fine
 
  • #16
and a quick question on limits

lim x right arrow 0 e^3x -1 / e^x -1

since anything to the root 0 is 1 you get 1-1/1-1 = 0
 
  • #17
gator said:
and a quick question on limits

lim x right arrow 0 e^3x -1 / e^x -1

since anything to the root 0 is 1 you get 1-1/1-1 = 0
So you're looking for

[tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 0} \frac{{e^{3x} - 1}}{{e^x - 1}}[/tex]

Have you seen L'Hopital's rule? Or can you factor the nominator knowing that [itex]e^{3x} - 1 = \left( {e^x } \right)^3 - 1^3[/itex]?
 
Last edited:
  • #18
L'Hopital's rule?
 
  • #19
Oh I see you made a mistake: (1-1)/(1-1) is 0/0 which isn't the same as 0...! You encounter an 'indeterminate form' here, namely 0/0 where you can apply L'Hopital's rule which states that in this case, you can take the nominator's and denominator's derivative (separately, so f/g becomes f'/g'). If you don't know this rule, try factoring so you'll be able to cancel out [itex]e^x-1[/itex].
 
  • #20
so like (e^x - 1)(e^x2 -e^x +1) so I now have e^x2 - e^x +1
 
Last edited:
  • #21
gator said:
so like (e^x - 1)(e^x2 -e^x +1) so I now have e^x2 - e^x +1
I think you made a small mistake, the second factor is (e^(2x) + e^x +1), it should have a plus. Then fill in x = 0 now :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
29K