Vertical Latch Friction Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Houdini176
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Vertical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the minimum horizontal force required to initiate motion in a vertical latch system involving two blocks, A and B, with friction at their interface. The initial approach incorrectly applied conservation of energy without accounting for friction, leading to confusion regarding the normal force. The correct method involves analyzing the static equilibrium of both blocks, where the net forces must equal zero, allowing for the determination of the normal force. By substituting the normal force into the equations, the correct expression for the force F can be derived. Ultimately, the correct solution incorporates the effects of friction, yielding F = (1+U)mg/(1-U).
Houdini176
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A side view of a simplified form of vertical latch is as shown. The lower member A can be pushed forward in its horizontal channel. The sides of the channels are smooth, but at the interfaces of A and B, which are at 45 degrees with the horizontal, there exists a static coefficient of friction U. What is the minimum force F that must be applied horizontally to A to start motion of the latch, if B has a mass m?"

I always found an incorrect "solution" to this, help finding the correct method would be appreciated.

Homework Equations



F*d=mg*d

-mg-U*N*sin(45)+F=0

N*cos(45)=F

The Attempt at a Solution



The block B should experience three forces in the vertical direction: the vertical component of the friction between the two blocks, the vertical component of the normal force, and gravity. The crux of the problem seems to be finding the normal force.

If there was no friction and the blocks were moving quasi-statically, B would move vertically as far as A moved horizontally. Using the conservation of energy, F*d=mg*d, and F=mg. Using this, it seems reasonable to say that the vertical component of the normal force is equal to the force placed on the block A. Because F is the vertical component of the normal force, it follows that:

F/cos(45)=N

(I'm really not sure how else to find the normal force, and I suspect that this step is where I've gone wrong.)

Because the question asks to find the minimum force needed to make the arrangement move, all the forces on B should add to 0.

-mg-U*N*sin(45)+F=0

-mg-U*F*sin(45)/cos(45)+F=0
-mg-U*F+F=0
(1-U)F=mg
F=mg/(1-U)

Unfortunately, the answer given is F=(1+U)mg/(1-U).

If I go backwards from that answer, it suggests that the vertical component of the normal force is (F+mg), which I refuse to believe. After all, if I applied a force equal to mg to the block, the vertical component of the normal force wouldn't be 2mg.

Anyway, any help would be greatly appreciated, along with any problem solving advice in general. I've been trying to teach myself physics, and I usually can't correctly solve the problems. I usually feel that my reasoning is sound, but it turns out not to be. It's disheartening.
 

Attachments

  • PhysicsDiagram.png
    PhysicsDiagram.png
    17.3 KB · Views: 586
Physics news on Phys.org
Solved. In case anyone is curious, the conservation of energy relation I used is incorrect. The conservation of energy is that simple if there is no friction, but in the case of this problem there is friction. Therefore, the work done by the force applied to block A gets divided into increasing the potential energy of B AND moving against friction.

The solution is to consider the static equilibrium of both blocks. Since the net force on each block will include the normal force, you can easily find the sum of every force on each individual block, set that sum to 0, solve for N, and substitute N out of the equations. You'll have a solution for F.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top