Vertical simple harmonic motion concept

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on vertical simple harmonic motion, a 0.12-kg block with a 30 g stone causes a spring to stretch an additional 5 cm, and the spring oscillates with a 12 cm amplitude. The net force on the stone at maximum upward displacement is debated, with one view stating it equals the stone's weight since the spring isn't moving. However, it is argued that at maximum displacement, the spring exerts a downward force, indicating that there is indeed acceleration and thus a net force acting on the stone. The confusion arises from the distinction between vertical and horizontal motion, where maximum acceleration occurs at amplitude extremes. Ultimately, the calculations suggest that the downward acceleration at maximum displacement is less than gravitational acceleration.
caljuice
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 0.12-kg block is suspended from a spring. When a small stone of mass 30 g is placed on the block, the spring stretches an additional 5 cm. With the stone on the block, the spring oscillates with an amplitude of 12 cm. What is the net force of the stone when it is at a point of maximum upward displacement

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is Fnet= mass of pebble x gravity. The solution says this is the case because the spring isn't moving.

But shouldn't Fnet = force of gravity + force of spring? Since at maximum compression, the spring will exert a down acceleration. Just because it's not moving doesn't have to mean it isn't causing acceleration right? And when I look at the position graph and the acceleration graph of horizontal simple harmonics, the greatest magnitude of acceleration of a spring is when the spring is at maximum compression or stretch- the amplitude. If there's acceleration then there must be force? Or is this different because this is vertical? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right, zero velocity do not mean zero acceleration. Assuming the pebble attached to the block during the oscillation, its acceleration has the highest magnitude at maximum displacement.
The solution might be correct if the box did not push the pebble at the top. The pebble is not fixed, so the block can only push it. But for that, an acceleration higher than g would be needed. You can calculate the angular frequency of oscillation, assuming that the block and pebble move together, and from that you get the maximum downward acceleration as amplitude times w2. It is less than g!

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top