Very simple charge question, please review

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Review
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the position of an electric field created by a -14.1 nC charge located at (2.48 cm, 1.24 cm). The correct formula used is E = kQ/r², leading to a calculated distance r of 0.02198 m. The final accepted answer for the electric field of -262600.0i is (0.04678 m, 0.0124 m), while an alternative calculation yielded (2.82E-3 m, 0.02198 m), which was rejected by the computer. The validity of the alternative answer hinges on the direction of the electric field, indicating that only the first answer is correct for the specified negative field. Understanding the directionality of electric fields is crucial in these calculations.
Ush
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A -14.1 nC charge is located at position (x,y) = (2.48 cm, 1.24 cm). At what (x,y) position is the electric field -262600.0i? (Enter your x position first followed by the y position.)

Homework Equations


E = kQ/r2
E = electric field strength
k = 9 x 109
r = distance to the point from the charge

The Attempt at a Solution



E = kQ/r2
∴ r = √(kQ/E)
r = 0.02198

original position: (0.0248m, 0.0124m)
electric field: -262600.0i,
unit vector 'i' indicates only x component, no y component:
therefore y component is the same (electric field vectors go straight in toward -'ve charge)

therefore x-component is..
0.0248 + r
=0.0248 + 0.02198
= 0.04678m

final answer:
(0.04678m, 0.0124m)

Originally what I did was
0.0248 - r
=0.0248 - 0.02198
= 2.82E-3

final answer:
(2.82E-3m, 0.02198m)


the computer rejected this.

The computer only accepted (0.04678m, 0.0124m) as the correct answer

I was wondering... is the other answer equally as valid or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the other answer, E would be +262600.0i and not -262600.0i.

You could draw the field lines around the charge and see for yourself.
 
thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top