Very simple complex powers problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aziza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expression (-1)^i and its representation in x + iy form. One participant argues that their solution, which includes a term for integer k, provides a more complete answer than the book's simplified version, e^(-π). The book's answer is seen as only presenting the principal value, which is common in complex analysis. The conversation highlights the multivalued nature of exponentiation with complex numbers and the importance of specifying k values. Ultimately, the participants conclude that the book's approach may overlook the nuances of complex exponentiation.
Aziza
Messages
189
Reaction score
1
Write the following in x+iy form: (-1)^i

my solution:
(-1)i = (ei(π+2πk))i = e-(π+2πk)

However, my book just states the answer as e-(π) ...but these are not the same...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For integer k, sure they are. Any full turn around the unit circle doesn't change the value.
 
Muphrid said:
For integer k, sure they are. Any full turn around the unit circle doesn't change the value.

but ei2πk and e2πk are different...the first one equals 1 but the second does not...

i mean look just plug in k=1 and k=2...you get e^-3 and e^-5, which are not the same
 
Oh, okay, I see what's going on. Yeah, in this case, you may be more correct than the book is. Someone with more recent experience than I in complex analysis may know something more specific to this, though.
 
Muphrid said:
Oh, okay, I see what's going on. Yeah, in this case, you may be more correct than the book is. Someone with more recent experience than I in complex analysis may know something more specific to this, though.

oh alright. idk my book is doing this same mistake for each and every related problem. so i was thinking that i must be doing something wrong. but maybe they are just giving the answer when k=0...although they never specify this...
 
Aziza said:
Write the following in x+iy form: (-1)^i

my solution:
(-1)i = (ei(π+2πk))i = e-(π+2πk)

However, my book just states the answer as e-(π) ...but these are not the same...

Your answer is more complete than the book's. Exponentiation to a complex power can give a multivalued result. The book just gave the principal value, which, if you're asked for a single answer, is the usual value we take.
 
Aziza said:
Write the following in x+iy form: (-1)^i

my solution:
(-1)i = (ei(π+2πk))i = e-(π+2πk)

However, my book just states the answer as e-(π) ...but these are not the same...
(Those π's are hard to read !)

Sure enough.

Give WolframAlpha, \displaystyle \left(e^{\pi} \right)^{1/i} or \displaystyle \left(e^{-3\pi} \right)^{1/i}\,, and it gives -1.

Of course, \displaystyle e^{-3\pi}\approx 0.0000806995175703\,, \displaystyle e^{-\pi}\approx 0.04321391826377226\,, \displaystyle e^{\pi}\approx 23.140692632779263\,,

So it looks like \displaystyle (-1)^i=e^{(\text{odd integer multiple of }\pi)}\ .
 

Similar threads

Back
Top