Very specific AGR reactor core question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on setting up a thermal hydraulic simulation for an AGR fuel bundle, specifically addressing the roughness and ribbing of the fuel pins' cladding. It is noted that the roughness height is likely between 0.8-1.2 microns, but the ribbing on the cladding surface is more critical for enhancing turbulence and heat transfer. A referenced article indicates the rib height is approximately 0.4 mm with a pitch of 2.75 mm, while the cladding diameter is around 15 mm. Additional resources provide further details on the pellet diameter and cladding wall thickness. Accurate representation of these parameters is essential for effective simulation outcomes.
Meb15aa
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am currently setting up a simulation for thermal hydraulic analysis of an AGR fuel bundle. However, the walls in this type of reactor, have a specific roughness that promototes turbulence which in turn provides better heat transfer characteristics. I am struggling to find data online to correctly represent the roughness height of the fuel pins. Any suggestions?

Thank you in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's not the roughness, which is probably on the order of 0.8-1.2 microns, but rather the ribbing on the cladding outer surface.

According to the following article, the rib height is approximately 0.4 mm with a pitch of 2.75 mm. Cladding diameter ~15 mm, which may the be mean (midwall) diameter.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214657116300314
https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/028/28028509.pdf
The article puts the pellet diameter at 14.5 mm and the cladding wall thickness at 0.38 mm.

Some additional details
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christophe_Gras2/publication/239358670_Post-irradiation_examination_of_a_fuel_pin_using_a_microscopic_X-ray_system_Measurement_of_carbon_deposition_and_pin_metrology/links/59e8bba4aca272bc424431ea/Post-irradiation-examination-of-a-fuel-pin-using-a-microscopic-X-ray-system-Measurement-of-carbon-deposition-and-pin-metrology.pdf
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the reply I found online that the rib height is 0.11 inches which somewhat matches the second reference you provided. Thanks again
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top