Why Does the Endolymph Move Opposite to Head Movement in Vestibular Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sameeralord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Hard
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of vestibular function, specifically how endolymph moves in response to head movement. When the head rotates, the inertia of the endolymph causes it to lag behind, resulting in pressure on the cupula that signals the brain about the head's movement. This phenomenon is similar to water in a rotating bucket, where the water remains still relative to the bucket until sufficient force is applied. The conversation clarifies that the endolymph's movement is opposite to the head's rotation due to inertia, and it emphasizes the role of force and friction in initiating movement in fluids. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping vestibular function.
sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Vestibular function is hard for me. Please help!

Hello everyone,

[PLAIN]http://thalamus.wustl.edu/course/aud9.gif

When you turn your head in the plane of the canal, the inertia of the endolymph causes it to slosh against the cupula, deflecting the hair cells. Now, if you were to keep turning in circles, eventually the fluid would catch up with the canal, and there would be no more pressure on the cupula. If you stopped spinning, the moving fluid would slosh up against a suddenly still cupula, and you would feel as though you were turning in the other direction. This is the explanation for the phenomenon you discovered when you were 5.

First of all I don't understand the pic. Why is the endolymph moving in opposite direction to the movement of head, shouldn't it move the same way. How is inertia involved in this and what is the paragraph saying.

Thanks :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


I think the picture represents a horizontal plane in your head?

By the inertia of the endolymph, it keeps still while the head rotates. Just like a bucket with water. If you suddenly start to rotate the bucket, the water stays still inside. It doesn't start to rotate. But relative to the bucket walls, one can say that the fluid is rotating in the opposite direction. That's what the arrows are supposed to signify in the picture.

When the head rotates, the endolymph fluid and the copula collide, causing a pressure. This pressure is sensed by the brain, talling it that the head is rotating.

I'm no biologist, so there is a fair amount of uncertainty here, to put it mildly...
 


torquil said:
I think the picture represents a horizontal plane in your head?

By the inertia of the endolymph, it keeps still while the head rotates. Just like a bucket with water. If you suddenly start to rotate the bucket, the water stays still inside. It doesn't start to rotate. But relative to the bucket walls, one can say that the fluid is rotating in the opposite direction. That's what the arrows are supposed to signify in the picture.

When the head rotates, the endolymph fluid and the copula collide, causing a pressure. This pressure is sensed by the brain, talling it that the head is rotating.

I'm no biologist, so there is a fair amount of uncertainty here, to put it mildly...

Thanks torquil, that was a great answer :smile: , much better than the explantion I noted before. I understood everything, how relatively water moves in other direction, but I have simple question since my physics is not good. When you rotate the water bucket, why does water stay still. Is it because you are only rotating the bucket and not the water, so water remains still. If you move it hard though water would also move right. I understood all the rest of the explantion though.
 


sameeralord said:
Thanks torquil, that was a great answer :smile: , much better than the explantion I noted before. I understood everything, how relatively water moves in other direction, but I have simple question since my physics is not good. When you rotate the water bucket, why does water stay still. Is it because you are only rotating the bucket and not the water, so water remains still. If you move it hard though water would also move right. I understood all the rest of the explantion though.

To get things to start rotating, like the water in the bucket, you need to act on it with a force. In the bucket example, not much force will be acted upon the water from the inner wall of the bucket since there is not much friction between it and the water, and the water viscocity is low. The water can slide relative to the inner bucket surface quite effortlessly, so therefore it takes a while of rotating the bucket until the water also rotates significantly, since the force that tries to make the water rotate is small.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top