A Vibrational relaxation through electron-hole pairs

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter thearif333
  • Start date Start date
thearif333
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How electron-hole pairs play its role in vibrational relaxation on a metal surface ?
When a molecule comes in contact with a metal surface, there are two channels which plays role in vibrational relaxation. One is Phonon channel and the second channel is electron-hole pairs in the metal. I googled it but can't find any literature to properly explain these two mechanism. Do anyone has any understanding of these relaxation processes ? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good evening,

You may also have some emission of photons from the molecule.

Your molecule interacts via Coulomb field with the surface and affects the electron-hole, yes. I think it may be named the Fano problem. It is however, not a dissipative channel.

Concerning the vibration relaxation, I would say that there are several processes.
- we have the phonon -> electron of the solid -> phonon of the metal channel;
- maybe vibration of the molecule -> phonon of the metal directly. But this I am less sure.

Maybe you can precise your question?

Best wishes,
Thibault
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top