Violation of 2nd Law of Thermodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of endothermic reactions in relation to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Participants explore whether exploiting endothermic reactions to transfer heat from a lower temperature reservoir to a higher temperature environment constitutes a violation of the Second Law.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that endothermic reactions could be used to take heat from a low-temperature sink and transfer it to a higher temperature environment, suggesting a potential violation of the Second Law.
  • Others argue that the Second Law states that total entropy in the universe tends to increase, questioning how the proposed scenario violates this principle.
  • A participant clarifies that endothermic reactions only proceed when the increase in entropy compensates for the decrease in temperature, implying that the process is not spontaneous.
  • Another participant explains that in exothermic reactions, the energy released corresponds to the energy stored in chemical bonds, reinforcing the laws of thermodynamics rather than violating them.
  • One participant cites a definition of the Second Law, emphasizing its role in explaining irreversibility in nature and the tendency for temperature differences to equalize in isolated systems.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the process described does not involve spontaneous heat flow from cold to hot, and that external energy is required to drive the endothermic reaction, resulting in a net increase in entropy.
  • Another participant reflects on the idea that chemical reactions absorb heat to achieve greater stability, indicating a level of intrigue regarding the implications of endothermic processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the interpretation of the Second Law and whether the proposed scenario constitutes a violation. The discussion remains unresolved, with differing interpretations of thermodynamic principles.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various interpretations of the Second Law and the conditions under which endothermic reactions occur, highlighting the complexity and nuance of thermodynamic concepts. There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions and implications of spontaneity in chemical reactions.

atom888
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Chemical reaction have 2 classifications: Exothermic and Endothermic.
Exothermic is when the chemical give off heat in the reaction.
Endothermic is when the chemical obsorb heat in the reaction.

So... If one exploit Endothermic reaction by keep taking heat from the low temperature heat sink and later use it to produce a higher temperature environment. Have we not indirectly violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The Second Law states that the total entropy in the universe tends to increase. Can you explain further how you think your thought experiment violates this statement? It isn't clear how an endothermic reaction could be used to "produce a higher temperature environment."
 
I think you're misunderstanding the law--endothermic rxns only 'go' when the entropy increase makes up for the drop in temp.
 
In an exothermic reaction, the amount of energy released is equal to the amount of energy stored in the chemical bonds. That's a demonstration of the laws of thermodynamics, not a violation of them.
 
Wesleytf said:
I think you're misunderstanding the law--endothermic rxns only 'go' when the entropy increase makes up for the drop in temp.

Well, there are many interpretations of the 2nd law, but I will put up what I most see it as.

from winki
"In simple terms, the second law is an expression of the fact that over time, ignoring the effects of self-gravity, differences in temperature, pressure, and density tend to even out in a physical system that is isolated from the outside world. Entropy is a measure of how far along this evening-out process has progressed.

There are many versions of the second law, but they all have the same effect, which is to explain the phenomenon of irreversibility in nature."

Alright, endo reaction take heat from the surrounding. Let say we do the reaction at 60F. Later we break the bond at 70F. We then release some heat to 70F environment. That means we have taken heat from lower source (60F) and tranfer it to higher source (70F). Heat cannot flow from cold to hot. Yet, it happens.
 
The Second Law says that heat does not spontaneously flow from a colder reservoir to a hotter reservoir. And that didn't happen in your example. You heated the substance from 60°F to 70°F. Then you applied energy to break the chemical bonds, because the endothermic reaction is less likely to run in reverse at a higher temperature. These additions of external energy were needed because the process is not spontaneous, and the result is a net increase in entropy in the universe. The Second Law isn't violated.

It's important to realize that an endothermic (or exothermic) reaction isn't necessarily spontaneous. A reaction is endothermic (exothermic) if the change in internal energy [itex]\Delta U[/itex] is positive (negative). It's spontaneous (non-spontaneous) if the change in free energy [itex]\Delta G[/itex] is negative (positive), and

[tex]\Delta G=\Delta U+p\Delta V-T\Delta S.[/tex]

If you think about the signs of [itex]\Delta U[/itex] and [itex]\Delta S[/itex], you'll see that your endothermic reaction at 60°F could not possibly run in reverse spontaneously at 70°F.
 
Hm... this just sum up to "the chemical absorb heat to becomes more stable". Interesting.
 
atom888 said:
Chemical reaction have 2 classifications: Exothermic and Endothermic.
Exothermic is when the chemical give off heat in the reaction.
Endothermic is when the chemical obsorb heat in the reaction.

So... If one exploit Endothermic reaction by keep taking heat from the low temperature heat sink and later use it to produce a higher temperature environment. Have we not indirectly violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics?

The quick answer is "Yes, and that is exactly why such a system cannot exist!"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K