Violation of Conservation of Momentum Law in Collisions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sk8rlindz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of momentum during a collision between a moving golf ball and a stationary bowling ball. It highlights that momentum is the product of mass and velocity, indicating that while the bowling ball is heavier, its lower speed results in comparable momentum to the golf ball. The golf ball is expected to bounce back after the collision, retaining some momentum, while the bowling ball's movement will be minimal. The conversation questions whether the golf ball's momentum could exceed its initial momentum post-collision, which would contradict the conservation law. Ultimately, the conservation of momentum remains intact as the total momentum before and after the collision is conserved.
sk8rlindz
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the conservation of momentum. if a moving golf ball hits a bowling ball that's not moving, wouldn't the momentum be bigger than the momentum of the golf ball before the collision? THe velocity of the bowling ball would be very small... doesn't this violate the momentum law?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The momentum of an object is equal to its mass, multiplied by its velocity. The bowling ball will obviously be much heavier than the golf ball, so it will not have as great of a speed, yet because of its mass, would still have about the same momentum. A golf ball would probably bounce back when it hits the bowling ball, so it would retain some of the initial momentum and the bowling ball would not move very much.
wouldn't the momentum be bigger than the momentum of the golf ball before the collision?
What are you trying to say here? The momentum would be about the same, because as you said, the bowling ball would have less speed, but it also has more mass so it's equal.
 
I was just wondering if the momentum would be bigger for the golf ball before the collision than after.. if it was wouldn't that prove the conservation law false?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top