Virial Theorem and Energy of a Two-Body System

AI Thread Summary
In a two-body system of identical particles orbiting their center of mass, the average potential energy is -2 times the average kinetic energy, leading to a negative average total energy. When energy is added to this system, it equilibrates, causing the average kinetic energy to decrease. This decrease occurs because the relationship E = T + V, where V = -2T, implies that an increase in total energy results in a reduction of kinetic energy. Consequently, the temperature of the system, which reflects kinetic energy, also decreases with the addition of energy. This phenomenon is linked to the concept of negative heat capacities in bounded systems.
torq123
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I want to make sure I am understanding this correctly.

Say we have two identical particles orbiting (in circles) about their center of mass.

We know that the average potential energy is -2 times the average kinetic energy.

So the average total energy is negative the average kinetic energy.

If we add a bit of energy to this system and wait for it to equilibrate, will the average kinetic energy increase or decrease?

My thought would be that it would decrease, because since the average total energy is negative the average kinetic energy, kinetic energy would have to decrease to make the math work.

Is there a good way to understand this, physically? And did I even reach the right conclusion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since E=T+V, and V=-2T, E=-T. Therefor adding energy makes T smaller.
 
That's a correct inference drawn and what u hav mentioned here is unsophisticated definition of Virial theorem...this is put to the explanation of negative heat capacities... for bounded system as mentioned above, an addition to the energy causes a decrease in kinetic energy..and since temperature is nothing but a manifestation of K.E., with the addition of energy the temp. of system decreases as well...
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
54
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
372
Back
Top