How does the Virial Theorem derivation for <K>=-<delta(U)> work?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains the derivation of the virial theorem, specifically how the average kinetic energy <K> relates to the change in potential energy <delta(U)>. It introduces the concept of the scalar moment of inertia, I, and defines the first derivative, G, as the 'virial.' The relationship between the second time derivative of I and the total kinetic energy T and potential energy U is established, particularly for power law potentials. The time average of the derived equation leads to the conclusion that in a virialized system, the average kinetic energy is proportional to the average potential energy. This theorem is particularly relevant in astronomy, where total energy measurements are taken over vast timescales, assuming systems are in a virialized state.
Himanshu
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Can somebody explain me how does the derivation for <K>=-<delta(U)> goes under the viral theorem?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
1.They define something called called 'scalar moment of inertia around the origin', I. It looks similar to moment of inertia around an axis in mechanics but not quite.

2. The first derivative G = (1/2) dI/dt is called 'virial'. They prove that the first derivative of the virial, dG/dt, i.e. the second time derivative of I , depends on the total kinetic energy T of the system and the potential energy U, when the potential energy is a power law ~ r^n:

dG/dt = 2T - nV (n=-1 for gravity)

3. They take the time average <...> of the above equation and claim that after long time the system 'virializes' so that the time average <dG/dt> = 0 which gives you an equation between the time averages of kinetic energy and potential energy:

<T> = (n/2) <V>

4. If we assume the system is 'virialized' i. e. in a stationary state, equilibrium, so that the total kinetic and potential energy do not change with time, the time averages will equal the energies at any time.

When that theorem is applied in astronomy, we measure/observe only the total kinetic and potential energies at a given time. We don't have access to time averaged values because the times involved are millions/billions of years but we assume the system is virialized already so the energy values equal the time averages.

All that (except point 4) can be found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virial_theorem
 
Last edited:
Thanks!
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top