Virtual Image Location for Negative Lens System?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the location of a virtual image created by a negative lens system. A user initially struggles with applying the thin lens formula, specifically the relationship between object distance (U) and image distance (V). It is clarified that the image produced by the first lens serves as a virtual object for the second lens, necessitating the use of a negative object distance. The importance of adhering to sign conventions in lens equations is emphasized, and a suggestion is made to review the derivation of the thin lens formula for better understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the application of lens formulas in multi-lens systems.
mrlevis
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


6pmeyv.jpg


S is a lighted object, height=1.
what is the final image that is created by the system?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i just don't understand how do i find the location of a virtual image created by a negative lens when the rays converge to a point beyond its focal point

thnks for helpers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why can't you just use the thin lens formula?
 
you mean this?:
1/f=1/U+1/V

i used this for the lens 1, and found that V, image distance, is 12, which means it is located 6 to the negative's right, 2 after the focal point.

So how can i use the equation for the second lens? U is supposed to be an object, not converging rays.
 
mrlevis said:
you mean this?:
1/f=1/U+1/V

i used this for the lens 1, and found that V, image distance, is 12, which means it is located 6 to the negative's right, 2 after the focal point.
All good.
So how can i use the equation for the second lens? U is supposed to be an object, not converging rays.
The image from the first lens becomes the object for the second. But since it's past the second lens, it must be treated as a virtual object. Just use the usual sign convention: If an object before the lens has a positive object distance, one after the lens would have a negative object distance.
 
oh... you right.
i don't know, for some reason i didnt think it would work.

but can you explain why is that? is there a simple proof to it?
 
I suggest that you review the derivation of the thin lens formula.
 
ok, thanks for help
 
Back
Top