Undergrad Virtual Particles and Charge Screening

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of virtual particles and their role in explaining charge screening. It argues that charge screening, where the observed charge of an electron is reduced due to surrounding electron-positron pairs, can be attributed to quantum fluctuations. The measured charge varies with distance, suggesting that virtual particles, while debated, are integral to understanding this phenomenon. The explanation involves complex concepts like photon self-energy and perturbation theory, indicating that a deeper understanding requires advanced knowledge of the beta function and renormalization group equations. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the ongoing debate in physics regarding the interpretation of virtual particles in quantum field theory.
David Neves
Messages
61
Reaction score
23
The following article says virtual particles don't exist or are just book keeping device.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/physics-virtual-particles

If that's the case, then how do you explain charge screening? We observe the charge of an electron to be less than the bare charge, or what it really is, because it is surrounded by a cloud of electron-positron pairs. Experiments confirm that the measured value of the electron's charge is determined by the distance fro which you measure it. How do you explain that without virtual particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "charge screening" or more accurately running of the electromagnetic coupling is due to quantum fluctuations. It can be calculated most simply by evaluating the photon self-energy. Of course, here "virtual particles" occur as explained in the Insights article, namely as internal line of Feynman diagrams, where they stand for propagators of the fields and thus well-defined mathematical expressions of perturbation theory.
 
You still need bookkeeping.

There probably is no answer at the intermediate level - to see what is going on involves the beta function in particular and the renormalization group equations in general, neither of which are undergraduate concepts.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
13K