Viscosity Troubles: Solving a Physics Dilemma

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mystery_Man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Viscosity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics investigation examining how temperature affects the viscosity of motor oil by measuring the terminal velocity of a sphere using Stokes' Law. The main challenge is calculating the frictional force (F) acting on the sphere, which must balance the buoyancy and gravitational forces for the sphere to fall at a uniform rate. The correct formula for viscosity can be derived from the difference in densities and the sphere's volume, but consistent viscosity values must be obtained across various test spheres. If the results are inconsistent, it may indicate that velocity-induced changes in the fluid's pressure profile are significant. Overall, the experiment highlights the complexities involved in accurately determining fluid viscosity through this method.
Mystery_Man
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Viscosity Woes :(

Hi,

I'm conducting a Physics Investigation where I'm changing the temperature of Motor Oil and seeing how the change in temperature affects viscosity of the oil. I am measuring the terminal velocity of the sphere in the oil (V). I'm Using Stokes' Law Equation: F=6piRNV. I've re-arranged this equation to: n = F/6piRV. I want to calculate the coefficient of viscosity directly, however I can't understand how to calculate the frictional force (F). Can anybody shed some light as to how I calculate this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i have never had to work out a problem as such, but in general for drag force you have

F = -Cv or F = -Dv^2

where you use the first for very small speeds and the second for large speeds. C and D are constants that depend on the shape of the object and the viscosity of the material
 
Well, one way of doing this is the following:
If the sphere is falling through the oil at a uniform rate, then the OTHER forces acting upon the sphere must balance the force of friction.

Assuming hydrostatic pressure distribution (which, at the very least, ought to require that the dimensions of the falling sphere is a lot less than the fluid volume), we ,may calculate the buoyancy force F_{b}=\rho_{fluid}V_{sphere}gacting upon the sphere. In addition, you'll have gravity working F_{g}=\rho_{sphere}V_{sphere}g.

where the indiced V is the volume of the sphere, and the rho's the densities
Thus, the force of friction will need to balance these to forces, which
means that your viscosity should be calculable from:
\eta=\frac{\rho_{s}-\rho_{f})V_{s}g}{6\pi{r}V}=\frac{2}{9}\frac{(\rho_{s}-\rho_{f})r^{2}}{V}

Note that the assumption that we have hydrostatic pressure can only be held if the given equation gives CONSISTENT values for \eta for a large variety of test spheres.

If we do not get consistent \eta-values, the most likely explanation is that we cannot neglect the velocity-induced changes in the pressure profile of the fluid.

Thus, if you do this experiment, you might find that using a falling sphere through a viscous fluid is not a particularly good way to determine the viscosity of the fluid..
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top