Visual effects of SR versus GR

TGlad
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
If you are traveling very very fast in a space ship, are there any visual effects produced by general relativity that you wouldn't see from just special relativity?
Assuming we don't get close to large gravity wells like black holes.

Does the acceleration of the ship produce any visual effects due to GR? As SR doesn't care about acceleration, just velocity.

In other words, if I wrote a renderer based on special relativity, would it look wrong as I flew around in space near light speed?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TGlad said:
Does the acceleration of the ship produce any visual effects due to GR? As SR doesn't care about acceleration, just velocity.
Acceleration of ship certainly produce rather weird and counterintuitive effects but they are still SR effects.

There is video that might give some idea:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQnHTKZBTI4"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great link.
I suppose that acceleration still affects the visual in SR because the ships motion changes during the duration of each light path.

So, could we conclude that a renderer based on SR (Lorentz) equations would be a good approximation to the real (GR) effect, if we stay clear of large gravity wells?
 
The best website dealing with SR & GR effects visualization is probably:
http://www.spacetimetravel.org/

You have to differentiate between SR & GR effects on the one hand, and signal delay effects on the other. The 4D ray tracers they use naturally incorporate both aspects. Here some of their publications:
http://www.sfb716.uni-stuttgart.de/uploads/tx_vispublications/vis05-weiskopf-relativity.pdf
http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/563/1/289/pdf/0004-637X_563_1_289.pdf
http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2006.69
 
TGlad said:
If you are traveling very very fast in a space ship, are there any visual effects produced by general relativity that you wouldn't see from just special relativity?
[..]
So, could we conclude that a renderer based on SR (Lorentz) equations would be a good approximation to the real (GR) effect, if we stay clear of large gravity wells?

Yes indeed: SR perfectly handles effects from acceleration, GR only adds effects from gravitation.
 
Thanks
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top