Voltage drop and transformer improvement

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating power loss and efficiency in an AC power transmission scenario. The initial power generated is 2.5 MW, with a significant power loss of 500 kW due to the resistance of the transmission line, resulting in an efficiency of 80%. A misunderstanding arises regarding the use of the formula P=I²R, which calculates power loss rather than total output power. When a step-up transformer is introduced, the efficiency improves to 99.2%, demonstrating the effectiveness of transformers in reducing losses. Clarifications highlight that P=VI and P=I²R can be interchangeable, but context regarding resistance is crucial for accurate calculations.
AstroJMT42
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Power station produces AC power at 2.5Mw, I = 100A.
Transferred along 100km line with a resistance of 50 ohms to a factory. Calculate power lost and % efficiency

Homework Equations



P=VI
P = I2R

The Attempt at a Solution



Initial power at the station is 2.5x106 . Using I2R you get new power at the factory of 1002x50 = 5x105W

This means a total loss of 2x105 and a percentage of 8%.

I'm pretty confident this is correct but a fellow student is adamant that I2R is power loss not total power out. His conclusion is that the line is actually 80% efficient, which sounds way to efficient to be correct, especially seeing as there are no transformers. Can anyone please confirm which of us is correct?

second part then takes the same original power and introduces a 1:5 step up transformer and 5:1 step down and asks to calculate the new power loss and new efficiency.

I worked initial V = 25,000 and after step up V = 125,000
New power after this using I2R is 2,480,000W which I calculated to be an efficiency of 99.2%
Again could you please check my logic is sound? There were no answers given.

Apologies it is actually 2 questions being asked but the second one leads directly from the first so thought it was best to keep it in one post.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your calculations. ## 2.5 \ 10^6 - 5 \ 10^5 = 2 \ 10^5 ## ?
Is the 50 ##\Omega## the resistance of the load in the plant or is it the resistance of the power cables ? So is it the useful power or the lost power ?
 
50 Ω is the resistance in the cable.

2,500,000W originally - 500,000 = 2,000,000W sorry that was a silly arithmetic error.

So that makes 500,000 / 2,500,000 x 100 = 20%?
 
Efficiency is useful power divided by input power. So: No.

Fellow student wins the argument.

Funny enouh you do have the right efficiency for the transformers in place case. Note the factor with which the loss is reduced!
 
So I squared R is is the power loss, not the new power?

I think this is where my misunderstanding is coming from. I thought P=VI and P=I2R were interchangeable. We were given original power and had to use P=I2R to find what the power is after traveling down the line. divide this output power by the original and multiply by 100 to get the percentage.
Which part of that am I getting wrong? it's been a long day...
 
AstroJMT42 said:
So I squared R is is the power loss, not the new power?

It depends which R you are talking about? The resistance of the cable or the load (aka the factory)?

If R is the resistance of the cable then I2R is the power dissipated (lost) in the cable.
If R is the resistance of the load (eg the equivalent resistance of the factory) then I2R is the power dissipated (used) by the factory.

I think this is where my misunderstanding is coming from. I thought P=VI and P=I2R were interchangeable.

In general they are. Provided you are talking about the right V, I and R.

We were given original power and had to use P=I2R to find what the power is after traveling down the line. divide this output power by the original and multiply by 100 to get the percentage.

Apply conservation of energy eg..

Power delivered to factory = Power generated - power lost in the cable.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top