Voltage, electricity and transformers question?

Arkane1337
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electric power plant generates electricity @ 22 kV
and 100 A. The voltage is stepped up to 240 kV before
being transmitted to a city 15 km away over a copper
wire that has a radius of 2 mm. Energy is lost in heating
the wire during transmission. If the transformer is 95%
efficient, and the price of electricity is 15¢/kWh, How
much money is saved per day by stepping the voltage up
instead of transmitting it at the original voltage?



Homework Equations


P1 = Ip^2 R
P2 = Is^2 R

Specific resistance of copper = pi d^2 R /4 L , where d = 4x10-3 m (?)
Sp.resistance of copper = 1.7x120^-4 ohm-m (?)

The Attempt at a Solution


No definitive idea of how to solve it unfortunately :/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Arkane1337! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Show us how far you've got, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
So far I have a few variables mapped out, and apparently, the first equation and 'part' figured out:

I = 100A, Vp = 22kV, r =2mm,

Equationing:
Part 1
VsIs = VpIp(.95)

Is = [(22)(100)(.95)] / [240kV]

= 8.708A (secondary transformer output current apparently)

Part2
Power Loss with/out step ups: (?)
P1 = Ip2*R
P2 = Is2*R

The specific resistance of copper is also 1.678 * 10-6 ohm-cm apparently

I'm not sure if what I have so far is right or truly relevant, nor what I should do next. A friend of mine claims that he found the answer to be $14,497,500 saved, but I'm not sure if that is correct. (Haven't gotten a chance to take a look at his actual work either.)
 
Last edited:
You've got V (RMS I presume) and I of the generator. That can tell you the total power, which is consumed - turned into heat - between the city, the wires and the transformer when there is one.

5% of that is power is consumed by the transformer. So you can work that out straightaway.

For the power consumed in the lines it would be more convenient to use V which you already have than I which you never need to know here. From the V's that you are given you can already work out the ratio of what you waste in the wires in the two situations. You can already see that bit is very in favour of upping the voltage.

For the actual amount I think though you do have to work out the resistance of the wire.

Expect the low voltage one to waste more than 5% otherwise it's pointless.

I notice that they haven't included in the problem any step-down transformers at the other end of the wire. There will be several of them and at least two steps down before the current arrives in the houses. A lot of transformers, presumably consuming more energy than the generator one? Never thought of it before. So when they say money saved does the generator companies costs end when the electricity arrives at the city?

But you are not asked that.

Also I thought the big transformers at the generator end did quite a bit better than 95%, very efficient.

The academic excercise is some use for some principles, but an engineer along here to explain some nitty gritties of power transmission would be additionally educative.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top