Voltage in capacitor after switch has been closed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the resulting voltage across two capacitors after a switch is closed, allowing charge to flow until equilibrium is reached. It clarifies that while the capacitors appear to be in series, they should be treated as parallel for voltage calculations, as they will have the same voltage across their plates. The confusion arises from the initial conditions where the capacitors have different charges, which complicates the series analysis. The key takeaway is that parallel capacitors have the same voltage, making it easier to calculate the final voltage, which is confirmed to be 1.80 V as per the textbook. Understanding the circuit configuration is crucial for accurate voltage measurement and analysis.
sailork
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The drawing shows two fully charged capacitors (C1 = 2.00\muF, q1 = 6.00\muC; C2 = 8.00\muF, q=12.0\muC). The switch is closed, and charge flows until equilibrium is reestablished (i.e., until both capacitors have the sam voltage across their plates). Find the resulting voltage across either capacitor.

**i have attached a jpg of the drawing


Homework Equations


q=CV , 1/Cs=1/C1+1/C2



The Attempt at a Solution


I know the capacitors are in series so I have attempted to find the resultant capacitance, as well as working from the voltages calculated via q=CV. However, I have been unable to find the answer listed in the back o the text (1.80 V). Please help point me in the correct direction.
 

Attachments

  • imd.jpg
    imd.jpg
    2.5 KB · Views: 598
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF :smile:

As a rule of thumb, series capacitors have the same charge, while parallel capacitors have the same voltage. Which is the case here?
 
Well by what is given in the problem, we are looking for the two capacitors to have the same voltage across their plates, but according to the drawing, the appear to be in series. However, if you look at the two capacitors as if they were in parallel, it would give the answer that is found in the back of the book. Is there a reason that they would be in parallel even though the image makes them appear to be in series?
 
Think of it this way:

Where would you put the voltage probes to measure the voltage?

What would the circuit diagram look like?
 
This is the one case where two capacitors are both in series and parallel (after the switch closed)

you get much further by considering them as parallel however, because:

Series capacitors have the same charge but only if they start out with the same charge. This is not the case here.
you can replace 2 series capacitors with their equivalent and it won't make a difference to the rest of the circuit, but this won't allow you to say anything about the charges of the 2 separate capacitors.

Parallel capacitors always have the same voltage across them. No ifs or buts here.
If you replace 2 parallel capacitors with their equivalent, the equivalent capacitor will have the same voltage across it as the original 2, making it easy to find out the charges on the original capacitors if you know the voltage across the equivalent capacitor.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top