Voltage source -> Ideal switch -> Resistance = Reactive power

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
foges
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
This is a problem i just can't get my head around.

When you have a circuit consisting of a "Ideal Voltage source -> Ideal switch -> Ideal Resistance" all in series. The voltage source produces a sinusodal voltage and the switch is set to cut off a part of any rising curve:

http://img383.imageshack.us/img383/8819/picture2ixx.png

Now if you do the calculations for the effective power that is dissapated at the resistance and the apparent power given off by the voltage source you will see that the apparent power is quite a bit higher than the effective power (P = 0.89*S for alpha = pi/3, (see picture)).

[tex]P_R = I_{eff}^2\cdot R, S = I_{eff}\cdot U_{eff}[/tex]

How does this happen? where is the reactive power going?PS: I have done all the calculations, I am not asking for those, I am looking for an explanation. Thanks :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The instantaneous power in a resistor is equal to the instantaneous voltage times the instantaneous current. These occur at the same time so there is no reactive component.
 
That would seem logical (what i thought), but check out the calculations (its in german, but shouldn't make much of a difference):

http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/4929/picture4w.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lots of luck with that...

The voltage across the resistor is the same as the voltage from the source when the switch is closed.
When the switch is open no power goes anywhere.

This is simple Ohms Law stuff. There is a voltage across a resistor and a current flowing in it. Why would there be any reactive component?