Volume flow and speed of the flow with different cross-sections and heights

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing the volume flow rate, flow speed, and water pressure at four points in a pipe with varying cross-sections and heights. The continuity equation indicates that flow speed is inversely related to cross-section area, while Bernoulli's equation highlights the relationship between pressure, speed, and height. It is clarified that pressure at point 1 is lower than at point 2 due to higher speed at point 1, and pressure at point 2 is greater than at point 3 despite equal speeds, because point 3 is at a higher elevation. The participants also note that the assumption of equal pressure at the same height only applies to standing water, and they discuss potential errors in the original question's setup regarding pipe widths. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying fluid dynamics principles to derive accurate conclusions.
Ryker
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


You have a pipe and 4 points on it. Points 1 and 2 are at h = 0, with point 1 having a smaller cross-section than point 2. Next, point 3 has the same cross-section as point 2, but the pipe goes up, so that h > 0. Point 4 is level with point 3, but has an even larger cross-section.

Rate the points according to:

1. The volume flow rate,
2. The flow speed.
3. The water pressure.

Homework Equations


The Bernoulli equation and the continuity equation.


The Attempt at a Solution


It's a been some weeks since we've covered this, and I just wanted to make sure I have the right idea.

1. The same everywhere.
2. Point 1 > points 2 and 3 > point 4. The difference in heights doesn't influence flow speed, if the area is the same, right?
3. Points 3 and 4 > points 1 and 2, because they are at the same height.

Is this correct? Thanks in advance.

Oh, and I know this one is really easy, but sometimes I just get sort of a mental block with getting some stuff I had already done, I don't know why. It's like I need to get past it and then everything flows smoothly again :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ryker! :wink:
Ryker said:
1. The same everywhere.
2. Point 1 > points 2 and 3 > point 4. The difference in heights doesn't influence flow speed, if the area is the same, right?

Right! :smile:
3. Points 3 and 4 > points 1 and 2, because they are at the same height.

You've missed something out …

have another look at Bernoulli's equation :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
You've missed something out …
have another look at Bernoulli's equation :wink:
P\ +\ \frac{1}{2}\,\rho\,v^2\ +\ \rho\,g\,h\ =\ constant

So from the equation, pressure at point 1 < pressure at point 2, because the speed at point 1 is greater. Also, since point 3 is higher than point 2, but the speed is equal, pressure at point 2 > pressure at point 3. And pressure at point 4 < pressure at point 3, because the speed is lower. But how can you then infer the proper order if you don't have the exact heights and cross-sections? Or is there something else I'm missing?

Oh, and same height = same pressure then only holds for standing water, I presume?
 
Hi Ryker! :wink:
Ryker said:
So from the equation, pressure at point 1 < pressure at point 2, because the speed at point 1 is greater. Also, since point 3 is higher than point 2, but the speed is equal, pressure at point 2 > pressure at point 3. And pressure at point 4 < pressure at point 3, because the speed is lower. But how can you then infer the proper order if you don't have the exact heights and cross-sections? Or is there something else I'm missing?

No, I agree with you. :smile:

(I suspect that they meant to ask the question with the pipe widths the other way round, so that it was 1 > 2 > 3 > 4, and got it wrong! :rolleyes:)
Oh, and same height = same pressure then only holds for standing water, I presume?

Well, for water at the same speed. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
No, I agree with you. :smile:

(I suspect that they meant to ask the question with the pipe widths the other way round, so that it was 1 > 2 > 3 > 4, and got it wrong! :rolleyes:)
Well, there was actually a picture, but I couldn't copy it here (it's in a .pdf file and I can't extract it), so it was indeed as I described. This question is actually from one of the previous exams, and I guess you can't quantify it better than that then, right? Which is kind of weird, because the question does specifically ask us to rank the points and indicate any ties.
tiny-tim said:
Well, for water at the same speed. :wink:
Yeah, and that :smile: I guess the mistake I made first was really silly of me. I mean, if the pressures were indeed the same, then what would we do with all of the Venturi meters?
 
Ryker said:
… if the pressures were indeed the same, then what would we do with all of the Venturi meters?

I'm sure we'd find somewhere to stick them! :biggrin:
 
tiny-tim said:
I'm sure we'd find somewhere to stick them! :biggrin:
Indeed and thanks for the help :biggrin:
 
Back
Top