Volume of ice needed to mitigate ocean warming since 1871

  • Thread starter Thread starter awink16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Ocean Volume
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy absorbed by Earth's oceans since 1871, quantified at 436 x 10^21 J. A calculation was proposed to determine the thickness of ice needed to absorb this energy, initially estimated at 2.8 meters, which sparked skepticism about its accuracy. Participants noted the need for correct units and values in the calculations, particularly regarding the heat of fusion of ice. The conversation highlights the complexity of calculating the effects of ice melting on ocean temperatures. Overall, the inquiry reflects the challenges in understanding the relationship between ice volume and ocean warming.
awink16
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Volume of ice needed to mitigate ocean warming since 1871
Relevant Equations
none
According to following study 436 x 10^21 J of energy have been absorbed by the Earth's oceans since 1871. https://www.pnas.org/content/116/4/1126

What thickness of ice covering the globe would be needed to melt in order to absorb this amount of energy, assuming that all energy goes towards the heat of fusion and an ice density of 917 kg/(m^3)? I came up with 2.8m but I'm not sure about my calculation. That answer just seems crazy. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the Earth were smooth the ocean (everywhere) would have a depth of ~3km. What thickness of melting ice would it take to lower the temperature of the ocean by 1deg C? (this is a one line calculation using the heat of fusion and the definition of the cal) Is your answer reasonable?
 
awink16 said:
heat of fusion of the ice, 2.09 J/g·°C,
What? Both the units and the value are incorrect.
 
yea I messed up. nevermind :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Heat Transfer. Ice and steam in a container (easy)
Replies
2
Views
4K
How many years would it take before the ice melted?
Replies
1
Views
4K
Calculating the Heat of Fusion for Water: A Scientific Approach
Replies
9
Views
4K
Heat and Phase change: latent heat
Replies
12
Views
13K
How Do You Calculate Heat and Enthalpy in an Ice Melting Lab?
Replies
1
Views
4K
Is my fictional Solar System stable and realistic?
Replies
21
Views
4K
How Does Entropy Change in a Water-Ice Bath with Vapor Introduction?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States
Replies
9
Views
28K
Could we use endothermic(heat absorbing) reactions to reduce hurricane strength?
Replies
16
Views
10K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top