Volume of region between two functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Khan86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Volume
AI Thread Summary
To find the volume between the functions z=2x^2-4 and z=4-2y^2, integration can be performed in two ways: first with respect to z and then with respect to z last. The integration limits for z first were set from 2x^2-4 to 4-2y^2, while for z last, x and y were bounded by the equations derived from the functions, leading to a range of z from -4 to 4. Confusion arises from the different results obtained from each method, with the second method yielding a volume of 128/3. The discussion highlights the need to visualize the three-dimensional region formed by the functions, which intersect to create a circular shadow in the xy-plane. Understanding the correct bounds for integration is crucial for accurately calculating the volume.
Khan86
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The two functions are z=2x^2-4 and z=4-2y^2, and I'm supposed to find the volume between the two by integrating two ways: one with respect to z first, and the other with respect to z last (x and y don't have a set order).

When integrating with respect to z first, I had the limits such that z ranged from 2x^2-4 to 4-2y^2, and since x and y only depend on z and z has been covered already, I thought that x and y both ranged from -2 to 2.

When I integrated with respect to z last, I had x range from -(z/2+2)^1/2 to (z/2+2)^1/2 and y range from -(2-z/2)^1/2 to (2-z/2)^1/2, with z ranging from -4 to 4.

The problem is that I got two different answers, although I feel more confident in my answer from integrating the second way, z last (128/3). Could anyone help me with where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're confusing me.

I don't understand:
You mention two one-dimensional functions, and you ask for the volume rather than area between them.
You write z=2x^2-4 as if z is a dependant variable, but then you claim to integrate with respect to z.

If you're talking about tbhe volume bounded by f(x,y)=2x^2-4 and g(x,y)=4-2y^2, I'm not sure that you can use a rectangular bounding region:
If I simplify 2x^2-4=4-2y^2, I get x^2+y^2=2^2 which is a circle of radius 2.

Perhaps you could look into using slices?
 
I'll try and describe the three dimensional region more clearly.

z1 = 2x^2 - 4 is a parabola in the x-z plane that runs all through the y-axis, if that makes sense. It is a three dimensional surface that happens to be independent of y, so it is the same parabola for all y-values. The same goes for z2 = 4 - 2y^2, except it lies in the y-z plane, meaning that the two functions are perpendicular to each other. The 3d space between z1 and z2 is a volume, bordered on top by z1 and on bottom by z2. The functions aren't two dimensional, they are just independent of the third, making the same two dimensional graph for all values of the third variable not in the equation.

Does that make any more sense? The problem I'm having is finding the bounds for dzdxdy and dxdydz.
 
Last edited:
In order to find the bounds, make an imagination of how that volume looks in space.

Integration bounds are there where both functions cut into each other, ea, share the same z value for a given x/y point.

Take it from there.

Greetz,
Leo
 
Khan86 said:
Does that make any more sense? The problem I'm having is finding the bounds for dzdxdy and dxdydz.

I mentioned in my post that the 'shadow' that this region casts into the xy plane is a circle. It's also relatively easy to identify that the z range is (4,-4).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top