Volume of Solid Rotated about Y-Axis: Estimate w/Simpson's Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter lollikey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
lollikey
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(a) If the region shown in the figure is rotated about the y-axis to form a solid, use Simpson's Rule with n = 8 to estimate the volume of the solid. (Round your answer to the nearest integer.)

Homework Equations


delta(x) = b-a/n
delta(x)/3 [ f(x) + 4f(x)+ 2f(x) + f(x)][/B]

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 7-7-039.gif
    7-7-039.gif
    4.2 KB · Views: 1,202
Physics news on Phys.org
my attempt at the solution was

delta(x) = 10-2/8 = 1

1/3[ 1+2(1.5)+4(2)+2(2)+4(3)+2(3.5)+4(4)+2(3.5)+1] = 59/3
 
lollikey said:

Homework Statement


(a) If the region shown in the figure is rotated about the y-axis to form a solid, use Simpson's Rule with n = 8 to estimate the volume of the solid. (Round your answer to the nearest integer.)

Homework Equations


delta(x) = b-a/n
delta(x)/3 [ f(x) + 4f(x)+ 2f(x) + f(x)]

The formula you have is incorrect for Simpson's First Rule, or at least, it is not written properly.

Let's stipulate that h = common interval = Δx = (b - a) / n, where a and b represent the x values of the start and finish, respectively, of the x-interval, and n is the number of intervals.

Then the area under the curve from x = a to x = b is

A = h * [f(x0) + f(xn) + 2Σ f(x2j) + 4Σ f(x2j-1)]

The Attempt at a Solution


lollikey said:
my attempt at the solution was

delta(x) = 10-2/8 = 1

1/3[ 1+2(1.5)+4(2)+2(2)+4(3)+2(3.5)+4(4)+2(3.5)+1] = 59/3

The first and last ordinates of the shaded area are both equal to 0, not 1.

Remember, the problem is asking to find the volume of the solid created by rotating the figure about the y-axis. Calculating the area under the curve is necessary, but not sufficient, to answer this problem.

To calculate the volume, you'll need to use the Second Theorem of Pappus in addition to Simpson's Rule:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PappussCentroidTheorem.html
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top