Vth voltage in thevenin theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the Thevenin theorem, specifically calculating the Thevenin equivalent voltage (Vth) and resistance (Rth) for a circuit. The equivalent resistance is determined to be 4Ω, and the open circuit voltage across terminals a-b is found to be 30V. It is noted that when a load resistor is connected, the voltage across terminals a-b will be less than 30V due to the voltage drop across the 4Ω resistor. The importance of calculating Vth as the open circuit voltage is emphasized, as it differs from the voltage when a load is present. The conversation concludes by affirming that the voltage at the terminals will match the original circuit or the Thevenin equivalent circuit.
PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
72
Hi, :smile:

Please have a look on Example 4.8. There are two scans.

1: http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/6673/understandingthevenin1.jpg
2: http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/3301/understandingthevenin2.jpg

First we find the equivalent resistance of the circuit on the left of terminals "a" and "b". The equivalent resistance comes to be 4Ω. In other words, we can replace the circuit part lying on left of terminals "a" and "b" with only one resistor of 4Ω. I hope I have it right.

Then we find Vth voltage which is appearing around terminals "a" and "b". This is the voltage which can be detected by a voltmeter around the terminals a-b. Vth is 30V.

Now have a look on Figure 4.29 in scan #2. We have 4Ω resistor (Rth, or equivalent resistance) in series with 30V DC source and RL (load resistor) which is connected to terminals a-b. It is obvious that some of the Vth, 30V, is going to drop around 4Ω resistor which means now the voltage which will appear around the terminals "a" and "b" will be less than 30V. Originally we found the Vth as the voltage which appears around the terminals a-b but now voltage which is appearing on terminals a-b is not Vth. Why is so? I hope you understand my question. Could you please tell me? Thanks.

Cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Thevinin Equivalent Circuit transforms a messy circuit into a simple voltage source + resistor series combination that is equivalent (I'll leave it for you to investigate the proof behind this long standing claim).

It is obvious that some of the Vth, 30V, is going to drop around 4Ω resistor which means now the voltage which will appear around the terminals "a" and "b" will be less than 30V. Originally we found the Vth as the voltage which appears around the terminals a-b but now voltage which is appearing on terminals a-b is not Vth. Why is so?

When you found the Vth value, you are calculating the Open Circuit Voltage at points a-b, which is how they were able to say "We ignore the 1R resistor since it has no current through it" i.e. they make the terminals a-b an Open Circuit, instead of the normal circuit which would probably have current flowing through the 1R resistor. This is similar to the previous problem thread where you added a voltage source to find the static value of the dependent source, in that it is a separate calculation and the circuits are not comparable.

As a side exercise, assume that Vab is not an open circuit, but an unknown voltage, and calculate what it comes out as.

In the end, what appears on the terminals a-b will be exactly the same as if you had either the original circuit or the Thevinin Equivalent circuit.

A different way of calculating the Thevinin Resistance is using Ohms law, with Voc / Isc, where Voc is the Open Circuit Voltage of a-b as calculated above, and Isc is similar, but calculating the current with terminals a-b Short Circuited instead.
 
Zryn, once again many thanks for all the help. I hope you would keep helping me! :)

Cheers
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top