W= -262.5 kg*m Sol'n: Calculate Force & Work of 5kg Sack Lifted 15m at 3.5 m/s

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim4592
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
A 5 kg sack of flour is lifted at a constant speed of 3.5 m/s through a height of 15 m, requiring a lifting force equal to its weight of 49 N to maintain zero acceleration. The work done on the sack by the lifting force is calculated as positive, resulting in 735 J, since the force and displacement are in the same direction. The confusion arose from incorrectly applying the acceleration in the force calculation, as the acceleration at constant speed is zero. The work done by gravity, on the other hand, is negative, calculated as -735 J, due to the opposing directions of the gravitational force and displacement. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
Jim4592
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 5.00 kg sack of flour is lifted vertically at a constant speed of 3.50 m/s through a height of 15.0 m.


Homework Equations


a) How great a force is required?
b) How much work is done on the sack by the lifting force?
c) What becomes of this work?


The Attempt at a Solution



Originally i assumed that acceleration at constant speed is the same as the speed, but then i realized that acceleration at constant speed is zero.

F=ma
F=5.00kg * 3.50 m/s
F = 17.5 kg * m/s
so when you include zero in the equation you get that there is no force?

But there has to be some force in order to calculate work

W=F*S*Cos(Θ)
W=F*(15.0m)*Cos(180) ; it would be 180 since its being lifted vertically correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think i figured it out right after i typed it... would you use gravity acceleration?

F = 5 kg * -9.8 m/s
F = -49 kg m/s

W = -49 kg m/s * 15.0m * cos(180)
W = 735 J

Does that seem correct?
 
Jim4592 said:
I think i figured it out right after i typed it... would you use gravity acceleration?

F = 5 kg * -9.8 m/s
F = -49 kg m/s

W = -49 kg m/s * 15.0m * cos(180)
W = 735 J

Does that seem correct?
You have the correct answer for the work, but your reasoning is a bit off. Since the object weighs 49N acting down (a kg m/s^2 is a Newton, by definition; the acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2 down), then in order for there to be no acceleration (constant speed implies no acceleration), the lifting force must be 49N up, (to give a net force of 0). The work done by that force is positive, since the displacement and lifting force are in the same direction. You seem to be calculating the work done by gravity, which is -735J (gravity acts down, displacement is up, so work done by gravity is negative.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top