Walter Lewin videos -- why ± 0.5 cm uncertainty why not ± 0.1?

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of a meter ruler or stick with a ± 0.1 cm uncertainty and how Professor Walter Lewin obtained a ± 0.5 cm uncertainty for his experiment. It is mentioned that the ruler calibration could be off, the ruler bends, and the precise position of the wires is difficult to measure. It is also noted that the measurement was demonstrated improperly and there is a proper methodology for using a ruler in scientific measurements. The conversation also mentions the dominant uncertainty in the length measurement and the 2% uncertainty in the time measurement. Finally, it is stated that measuring the length more precise than 0.5% is unnecessary.
  • #1
benny91xp
1
0
here is the link to walter lewin video lecture please jump to 13:13

8.01x - Lect 2 - 1D Kinematics - Speed, Velocity, Acceleration

i thought that all meter ruler/ meter stick use ± 0.1 cm as uncertainty .how did he get ± 0.5 cm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The ruler calibration could be off a bit, the precise position of the wires is not easy to measure, the ruler bends a bit. +- 0.5 cm is a conservative estimate.
It doesn't really matter for the experiment he wants to perform.
 
  • Like
Likes benny91xp
  • #3
He demonstrated the measurement improperly. The length has two measures, one at each end. He aligned the "0" of the ruler at one end of the length and assumed 0 error for the measurement at that end, then read the other end with an estimate of error...

The proper way to measure like that is to lay the measuring ruler randomly (not aligning the "0" on the ruler at one end of the length to be measured), take a reading from the ruler at each end of the length, and subtract the greater from the smaller.

In popular culture people set the "0" end of the ruler or tape measure and simply read the other end as their result. Length measures in science must not be done like that. There is a proper methodology for using a ruler, as well as methodologies for estimating error, significant digits, and rounding... and how to take all this into account when doing the math.
 
  • #4
He has a 2% uncertainty in the time measurement. Measuring the length more precise than 0.5% is unnecessary.

The dominant uncertainty of the length measurement is not the reading of the ruler either, it is the 3D shape of the ruler and possibly its calibration.
 

1. Why does Walter Lewin use a ±0.5 cm uncertainty instead of ±0.1 cm?

Walter Lewin uses a ±0.5 cm uncertainty because it is a standard level of precision commonly used in scientific experiments. It is also considered a reasonable level of uncertainty for measurements taken in laboratory settings.

2. Why is it important to include an uncertainty when making measurements?

An uncertainty is important because it accounts for the potential error in a measurement and provides a range within which the true value is likely to fall. Without an uncertainty, the accuracy and reliability of the measurement may be called into question.

3. How is uncertainty determined in scientific measurements?

Uncertainty is determined by considering the limitations of the measuring instrument, the precision of the measurement, and any potential sources of error. It is typically expressed as a range, such as ±0.5 cm, to indicate the level of uncertainty.

4. Can the uncertainty in a measurement be reduced to ±0.1 cm?

In most cases, it is not possible to reduce the uncertainty in a measurement to ±0.1 cm. This would require extremely precise measuring instruments and control over all potential sources of error, which is not always feasible. However, scientists strive to minimize uncertainty as much as possible through careful experimental design and data analysis.

5. Does the uncertainty in a measurement affect the accuracy of the result?

Yes, the uncertainty in a measurement does affect the accuracy of the result. A larger uncertainty means there is a greater range within which the true value may fall, making the result less precise. To improve accuracy, scientists may use more precise measuring instruments or reduce potential sources of error.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
29
Views
19K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
734
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top