Programs Should You Apply for a PhD Track to Secure a Master's Admission?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the strategic decision of applying for a PhD program to increase admission chances for a funded master's in physics, despite not intending to pursue a PhD. Participants highlight that universities often favor PhD candidates due to the longer commitment and potential for more research output, which benefits faculty CVs and career advancement. Concerns are raised about the ethical implications of taking a PhD slot from a genuine candidate, with some expressing discomfort about the idea of using the system for personal gain. Ultimately, the conversation reflects a tension between personal ambition and ethical considerations in academic admissions.
Thert Gurt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Suppose that I would like a master's in physics, but not a PhD, and consider a university that offers a funded master's program.
I understand that universities prefer to take PhD students rather that MS students (since one may squeeze more cheap research labor out of a 3+ year grad student than out of a 1 or 2 year grad student).
So...should I apply for a PhD track, to increase my chances of addmission?
I have no ethical concerns.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thert Gurt said:
Suppose that I would like a master's in physics, but not a PhD, and consider a university that offers a funded master's program.
I understand that universities prefer to take PhD students rather that MS students (since one may squeeze more cheap research labor out of a 3+ year grad student than out of a 1 or 2 year grad student).
So...should I apply for a PhD track, to increase my chances of addmission?
I have no ethical concerns.

It's not only squeeze labor. It also looks better on Professors' CVs, and is a requirement for them to move up the ladder from Assistant to Full Professor.
 
Thert Gurt said:
I have no ethical concerns.

Evidently not. It's not, however, something I would be proud of.

By doing this you will be depriving someone else of their chance to get a PhD, because you will be in their "slot". I don't think that's something PF should be encouraging.

Thread locked.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Back
Top