Was just looking at binomial theorem, i am confused [help]

seto6
Messages
248
Reaction score
0
i was told the binomial theorem is as follows:

(1-x)^n = 1-nx+ (n(n-1)/2!)x^2 - (n(n-2)/2!)x^3 ...
not sure if this is right

could some one clear this doubt for me
any help is appreciated

was told this in a physics class
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi seto6! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 tags just above the Reply box :wink:)

It's usually written (A + B)n = ∑i=1n nCi AiBn-i

where nCi = n!/i!(n-i)!.

So in your case, (1 - x)n = ∑i=1n nCi (-x)i

= 1-nx+ (n(n-1)/2!)x2 - (n(n-1)(n-2)/3!)x3 ... :wink:
 
seto6 said:
i was told the binomial theorem is as follows:

(1-x)^n = 1-nx+ (n(n-1)/2!)x^2 - (n(n-2)/2!)x^3 ...
This last term is wrong. It should be n!/(3!(n-3)!)= n(n-1)(n-2)/3!. In general the ith coefficient is n!/(i!(n- i)!)= n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-i+1)/i!

not sure if this is right

could some one clear this doubt for me
any help is appreciated

was told this in a physics class
Since your teacher is not here to defend himself, I am going to assume you miscopied.
 
Yes that's (nearly) the best way to express the more general binomial theorem where "n" is not necessarily an integer.

Normally however you'd use "+" as the default (and just absorb the "-" into the "x" if you need negative). That is

(1 + x)^n = 1 + n x + n(n-1)/2! x^2 + n(n-1)(n-2)/3! x^3 + ...

For the case where n is a positive integer then the above series terminates at the (n+1)th term, when you get down to n(n-1)(n-2)…(n-n), as this and every following term is multiplied by zero. In this case it reduces to the more familiar binomial theorem as shown in the preceding two posts.

Also, while its convenient to have one of the terms fixed at 1 (especially for the non terminating series) its obviously not fully general in that form. Most general is (a+b)^n, but in that case I prefer to just factor out the a^n, as in a^n (1+ (b/a)^n), and proceed as before.

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
2
Replies
91
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top