MHB Water Displacement Volume question

AI Thread Summary
Discussions about water displacement clarify that the volume of an object is not simply the volume of displaced water. Instead, the volume is calculated by determining the dimensions of the water displaced, which involves measuring the height difference when the object is submerged. In this case, a height difference of 0.02m, along with the bridge's length of 3.5m and width of 2m, results in a calculated volume of 0.14m³. This understanding resolves initial confusion about the relationship between displaced water and the object's volume. The explanation effectively highlights the correct method for calculating volume through displacement.
akarikairi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is the wrong category for this.

I am mostly confused about this question because I thought that displaced water WAS the volume of any given object. I'm confused by the reasoning of the actual answer for this. Is there something I'm missing here?

View attachment 4707
 

Attachments

  • math prob2.jpg
    math prob2.jpg
    31.2 KB · Views: 94
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The difference between the height of water when the bridge is immersed minus the height of the water when the bridge is removed is 0.02m. This is not the volume of the bridge; you need to calculate the volume of water with a height of 0.02, a length of 3.5m and a width of 2m:

$$3.5\text m\times2\text m\times0.02\text m=0.14\text m^3$$

This is the volume of the bridge.
 
Ah ok, that makes sense. I see it now. Thanks for clearing that up :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top