Water not conducting in my experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conductivity of water, highlighting that pure water is a non-conductor of electricity, while tap water can conduct due to dissolved ions. An experiment using tap water, a 1.5V battery, and a light bulb failed to light the bulb, leading to confusion about water's conductive properties. It is clarified that while tap water does conduct electricity, it is significantly less conductive than metals like copper. The conversation emphasizes that clean deionized water is a non-conductor and that such water is not found naturally, as it temporarily ionizes. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate experimentation with water conductivity.
linux kid
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Last night my cousin and I were arguing the conductivity of water. I was taught that water is a conductor of electricity, but he claims otherwise.

So, we did a simple experiment using tap warm water, a 1.5v battery and small light bulb. It refused to conduct and the light bulb would not light.
We tried this on the - and + wires and my cousin claimed victory.

So what went wrong. Either I had a horrible teacher or I was just dreaming...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pure water is non conducting as is most tap water. It is the dissolved ions in solution that allow water to conduct. For example copper has an electrical conductivity about 1.2 x 109 times greater than drinking water.
 
Actually Tap water is not to bad of a conductor, if you had used a ohmmeter to conduct the test instead of a 1.5V battery and a light bulb, you would have incorrectly won the argument.

The fact remains that clean deionized water is a non conductor. It is also a fact that such water does not exist naturally. The deionization is temporary as a small percentage of water molecules tend to ionize naturally. DI water systems consist of plastic pipes and must be kept flowing continuously as to filter the natural ions which occur.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top