Wave Convergence generator, pretty patterns

AI Thread Summary
A web browser program has been developed to generate complex wave patterns similar to those seen in cymatics and wave tanks. The program simulates water ripples by modeling the interaction of multiple drops creating concentric sine wave rings, producing visually striking 2-D patterns. It incorporates a simple mathematical framework, relying on multiplications and additions rather than complex equations, inspired by the behavior of waves rebounding in a tank. The creator acknowledges that while the visual results are compelling, the underlying mathematics lacks precision, particularly for different shapes like round ponds. The discussion highlights the fascinating relationship between wave patterns and their mathematical representations, despite the program's inaccuracies.
sr8
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, here is a web browser program of a complicated wave-pattern generator:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/114667999/Public.html

i wished to have a formula that explains cymatics patterns, and patterns found in wave tanks, because they are fascinating. I wrote an program that can produce similar patterns to those found in square 2d plates wave tanks. it has some distant relation to wave interactions on the atomic scale perhaps?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bessel functions come to mind. But it depends on the shape of your vibrating drum head/cymatics plate. Different shapes can have different special functions for solutions.

What does your program do? Numerically solve some form of laplace's equation?
 
it is uber simple mathematics, so everything was written using multiplications and additions. rather than deriving an equation, the program is inspired by thinking of water ripples.

when a drop arrives in the middle of a water tank, it it rebounds simultaneously from the 4 borders towards the centre again and the waves combine by addition. so I coded 5 drops in different positions, one drop in the middle, and 4 drops around it in a cross pattern, each drop on water is a concentric ring of sine waves. the resulting 2-D patterns were amazing, so I figured that the waves would rebound again at the other end of the wave tank and so I should add another 4 drops further away, to make more the physical modelling even better. So what you see is basically 9 drops falling on an infinitely large pond in a cross pattern. varying the distances of the 1st and 2nd set of concentric rings, from the centre, as well as their amplitude and period, produces all the variation.

As a finishing touch, I added another concentric polar rose in the middle that should be similar to some of the radial patterns that would happen due to reflections that corners of the wave tank/two-dimensional metal plate, and it exponentially multiplies the variation of patterns from the original 9 drop model. What it is missing is real mathematics!

In a cymatics plate there are very strong standing waves relative to the length of the plate parallel and at 45'degrees, and the plate tends to form square and Diamond shaped cells of similar wave patterns. I don't know how you would rewrite it for a round pond! the result is an imaginary material mathematically completely inaccurate! It's because I learned mathematics by designing synthesisers, and when you recreate sounds of violins and gongs, you have to kind of make up a physical model of the instrument with sine waves etc! sonically it's a not at all harmonious.

also note that combining round and square makes the mandelbox ;)
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top